Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Started by ltseung888, July 20, 2007, 02:43:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 52 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 788 789 790 791 792 ... 1075
User actions

hansvonlieven

#3945
February 17, 2009, 01:44:37 AM
Patent application on a bearing?????????????

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

chrisC

#3946
February 17, 2009, 02:03:41 AM
Quote from: utilitarian on February 16, 2009, 10:47:29 PM
That is a good theory, but the only thing is that WIPO patent application, where it does list Lawrence and Mr. Lee.

Patent application is totally meaningless. It's not even worth the paper it was applied on!
Isn't it the same patent application Mr. tseung so proudly proclaimed a while ago and when we did a search on it, the WPO office action basically said it was un-patentable because it was flawed? Also a few pages ago, he said they were 'giving' the secrets free to the rest of the world and will not pursue the Intellectual Property. Eh?

Now, a patent application that is thrown out has what value exactly?

cheers
chrisC

hansvonlieven

#3947
February 17, 2009, 02:20:17 AM
The application had nothing to do with bearings though, did it Chris?

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

utilitarian

#3948
February 17, 2009, 02:29:28 AM
Quote from: chrisC on February 17, 2009, 02:03:41 AM
Patent application is totally meaningless. It's not even worth the paper it was applied on!
Isn't it the same patent application Mr. tseung so proudly proclaimed a while ago and when we did a search on it, the WPO office action basically said it was un-patentable because it was flawed? Also a few pages ago, he said they were 'giving' the secrets free to the rest of the world and will not pursue the Intellectual Property. Eh?

Now, a patent application that is thrown out has what value exactly?

cheers
chrisC

Well yes, if no kind of identification is required to file a patent, then it means nothing. you're right.  The issue here is not the value of the application, which of course there is none, since no patent was granted, but whether there is a reasonable probability that the person here really is Lawrence Tseung.  But really, even if that part were true, that still leaves us nowhere.

chrisC

#3949
February 17, 2009, 02:29:33 AM
Quote from: hansvonlieven on February 17, 2009, 02:20:17 AM
The application had nothing to do with bearings though, did it Chris?

Hans von Lieven

Hans:

Well, you may be right. Even if this patent concerned these super duper bearings, the standard of Chinese patents leaves much to be desired. Any Tom, Dick or Larry can invent their own self-denials, from Lead-Out Energy to non-bearing bearings(?).
We'll have to wait and see which Wang got the $200M monopoly money? Maybe it's from the Paul R foundation?

cheers
chrisC
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 788 789 790 791 792 ... 1075
User actions