The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

What purpose does this post serve?

You are merely increasing Stefan's bandwidth problems.

@Paul-R

Is that so? You just added a few hundred bytes of data!
So, what was your purpose?

cheers
chrisC

[Pirate88179]

What purpose does this post serve?

You are merely increasing Stefan's bandwidth problems.

And your post here does what exactly?

Bill

[ltseung888]

Following the success of the Flying Saucer Proof-of-Concept experiments, the experimenter got ambitious.  They would like to build the Pulse Motor according to the Lee-Tseung theory.

In the diagram, the Electromagnetic Coil E will attract the permanent magnets F and drive them and thus the cylinder in the clockwise direction.  The trick is the use of the two detectors C and D.  When C detects the passing of the magnet to position A, current is passed to Electromagnet E.  Magnetic Attraction will accelerate the permanent magnet causing a rotation in the Clockwise direction.  When D detects the passing of the magnet to position B, current is switched off.  Thus the rotation will not be retarded due to the attracting back of the magnet.

This is the theoretical proof-of-concept of the Lee-Tseung Lead-Out theory.  The pulsing would lead-out electron motion energy.  The amount of energy lead-out is more than 50% of the energy supplied.  The amount of energy lead-out will be a function of the pulsing strength, the rotational speed and the number of magnets on the cylinder.

I wish the experimenters every success in their hard work.

[nievesoliveras]

@tseung

I understand the principle shown. and I think that the repulsion method is simpler. Beacuse it only uses one detector to trigger the electromagnet to repulse the magnets and it shuts itself off after the magnet is not in front of it.

I do respect your idea though.

It is just an opinion of mine. I think that we experimenters, must look for the simplest way to accomplish the task and with the fewer parts as possible. On the long run it will be easier to maintain it working well, if it has just a few parts that could be replaced easily if they get damaged by continuous use.

Remember, I could be wrong though.

Jesus

[ltseung888]

@tseung

I understand the principle shown. and I think that the repulsion method is simpler. Beacuse it only uses one detector to trigger the electromagnet to repulse the magnets and it shuts itself off after the magnet is not in front of it.

I do respect your idea though.

It is just an opinion of mine. I think that we experimenters, must look for the simplest way to accomplish the task and with the fewer parts as possible. On the long run it will be easier to maintain it working well, if it has just a few parts that could be replaced easily if they get damaged by continuous use.

Remember, I could be wrong though.

Jesus

I know that repulsion also works.  However, theoretically, once repulsion starts, the distance between the Coil and Magnet will increase.  The repulsion force will get weaker.

The experiments we have done so far indicated that the device could jump higher with attraction.  Thus the experimenters are exploring attraction.  It is possible that after some tests, they may fall back to repulsion.

In the innovative world, I encourage inventors to explore and test the unknown.  I thought of using one coil and two magnets initially.  But Mr. Tong Po Chi explored the case of two coils and one magnet.  The result was much better.

The experience will be shared.  The World will benefit together.