The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ProffesorChong]

Laurence,
     We received your battery powered motor and can validate that it does include a piece of paper stating COP>1.  Regarding using an oscilloscope to measure AC input and output, we offer a three day training course for inventors at a bargain rate of $150,000 HK.  Up to 15 people can sign up for the course to reduce the cost to $10,000 HK per person if that seems more reasonable.

Sincerely, Professor Chong

[Devil]

Advice to the various inventors and followers

To Tseung: continue to ignore the debunkers and insulters.  You have confirmed results for COP>1.  That result can be reproduced, double-checked.  You can already produce Educational Products that demonstrate that fact.  It is a matter of when you begin the production.  The remaining problem is to control the runaway current/voltage problem.  Once that is achieved, you can produce the 5KW electricity generator.  That is a solvable problem â€" you do not need to solve it alone.  Letting others shine is a good approach.

To Bedini: change your Pulse Control mechanism.  You can add the feature of cutting off the Pulsing after a certain rpm and turning it back on when the rotation falls below another rpm.  Use a large wheel to allow time for the Lead-Out Energy mechanism.  Use Loopback so that the Input Energy is not restricted by Input Battery.  In other words, understand the Lead-Out Energy theory and control mechanism.  Use your own special control mechanism.

To Newman: you are the first on record to develop and demonstrate an Overunity machine that can recharge the battery.  Many others have now surpassed you.  Study and understand the Lead-Out theory.

To Liang: you have an edge over Tseung and Tong.  You already use ICs and program-control to pulse rotate the inner cylinder.  However, that will mainly Lead-Out gravitational energy.  How do you plan to overcome that drawback?

To Wang:  your electricity generator was revealed many years ago.  What are the plans to introduce it to benefit the World?  Have you received so much money that you do not even care about your great invention?

To all the other inventors: there is no need to be discouraged.  It is like the early days of the airplane.  Many Inventors come up with many different ideas.  The Lead-Out Energy Machines from Tseung are at their infancy.  There is much room for improvement.

To all the debunkers and insulters, you are welcome to come to my home.  I shall give you a very, very warm welcome.

[Top Gun]

Advice to the various inventors and followers

To Tseung: continue to ignore the debunkers and insulters.  You have confirmed results for COP>1.  That result can be reproduced, double-checked.  You can already produce Educational Products that demonstrate that fact.  It is a matter of when you begin the production.  The remaining problem is to control the runaway current/voltage problem.  Once that is achieved, you can produce the 5KW electricity generator.  That is a solvable problem â€" you do not need to solve it alone.  Letting others shine is a good approach.

To Bedini: change your Pulse Control mechanism.  You can add the feature of cutting off the Pulsing after a certain rpm and turning it back on when the rotation falls below another rpm.  Use a large wheel to allow time for the Lead-Out Energy mechanism.  Use Loopback so that the Input Energy is not restricted by Input Battery.  In other words, understand the Lead-Out Energy theory and control mechanism.  Use your own special control mechanism.

To Newman: you are the first on record to develop and demonstrate an Overunity machine that can recharge the battery.  Many others have now surpassed you.  Study and understand the Lead-Out theory.

To Liang: you have an edge over Tseung and Tong.  You already use ICs and program-control to pulse rotate the inner cylinder.  However, that will mainly Lead-Out gravitational energy.  How do you plan to overcome that drawback?

To Wang:  your electricity generator was revealed many years ago.  What are the plans to introduce it to benefit the World?  Have you received so much money that you do not even care about your great invention?

To all the other inventors: there is no need to be discouraged.  It is like the early days of the airplane.  Many Inventors come up with many different ideas.  The Lead-Out Energy Machines from Tseung are at their infancy.  There is much room for improvement.

To all the debunkers and insulters, you are welcome to come to my home.  I shall give you a very, very warm welcome.

Dear Devil:

What is your advice to the Governments who already developed Lead-Out Energy Machines?

[Devil]

To the Governments and those who already have the Lead-Out Energy Technology

You are worried about the Evil ones on Earth who would be able to develop the Flying Saucer that would never run out of fuel or ammunition.  Your power to dominate would be over.

The same worry occurred once to the Chinese Emperors who witnessed the power of the Gun Powder.  They forbid its development.  When the West developed the technology, China became a victim.  The Lead-Out Energy Technology will allow the human race on Earth to go to outer space with ease.  There is no need to carry fuel.  If they can recycle food and human waste, they will never go hungry.

Tseung et al have developed the technology with negligible resources.  They have presented it at Open Shows.  Your debunker and insulter tactics did not work.  Such tactics are doomed to fail if Tseung et al can produce the prototypes. 

If you do not develop the technology when you have a chance, the Human Race on Earth will become victims to be enslaved by another civilization soon.  (or by a Nation willing to develop such technology on Earth)  Which is the more Evil path?

[teslaalset]

FYI, I have started to collect components for replications.
Below bike wheel seems a good start to have an aluminum wheel with good bearings and a diameter of approx. 70 cm (28 inch).
It even has a build in alternator, although it is 6 V (3W).
I ordered it from a German website, it will take some time to arrive.

I am aiming to have the coil mountings adjustable in radial direction, as Lawrence indicated that some flexibility is needed there.

p.s. I am a very slow builder, so don't expect fast progress.
I will keep you posted on my progress.

Lawrence, a few more questions:
1) what kind of magnets did you use? Neodynium? or ceramic? Neodynium ones are not advised in case a soft iron coil core is used. These cores saturate easy because of the strong field Neos have.
2) are all magnet poles facing out in radial direction or facing in tangential direction ?