The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[The Observer]

To Chris and Util,

You clearly don't understand what I am talking about when I say that electron energy is 'lead out' in a speaker.
That's ok guys, you have alot learn and (science is a closed book) blinders to take off.

Understand these concepts.

      1. A common speaker's parts include
                                                                   - A Magnet
                                                                    - A Coil hooked up to the diaphragm
                                                                   - A piece of Iron inside the coil.

      2. A Coil produces a Magnetic Field when hooked up to a potential difference (a battery).

      3. For a given Speaker... you can replace the Magnet with a Coil (hooked up to a potential difference.)

      4. For a given Speaker... you can take out the iron.

      5.What you have left is a speaker made of
                                                                             - A large coil connected to a potential difference.
                                                                             - A small coil hooked up to the diaphragm.

      6. Now compare the energy needed to make the same sound.
                                                                                                            Ferromagnetic Speaker vs. Coil Speaker.

                               Whala.. you will find that the coil speaker takes much more energy to run.

Why? Because magnetic density is measured in AMPERES/sqMETER.
           And AMPERES refers to electron current.

           You see, unpaired electrons in Ferros create a magnetic field, just like a coil of wire hooked up to battery !

           Something you obviously didn't know !

Please communicate back to me if you understand this.
If not... I can make a nice diagram with pictures.

Cheery Regards,
                            The Observer

P.S. You seem stumped on my Moon/ Tides Example.
        Because tides do work on the earth's surface... gravitic energy is used, yet the moon doesn't come closer to the earth.
        If there wasn't extra energy somewhere... conservation of energy dictates the moon crashes into the earth !
   

[utilitarian]

P.S. You seem stumped on my Moon/ Tides Example.
        Because tides do work on the earth's surface... gravitic energy is used, yet the moon doesn't come closer to the earth.
        If there wasn't extra energy somewhere... conservation of energy dictates the moon crashes into the earth !

The moon has too much inertia, that's why it's leaving orbit.  You are confusing things because you dont understand the forces at play.  The earth's rotation is indeed being slowed by tidal action, so there is your cost.  No free energy, nothing being lead out.

[The Observer]

Util,

You refuse to answer the speaker question.
My guess is ChrisC will not either.

Then you say,

The moon has too much inertia, that's why it's leaving orbit.

All I can say is... Where's it going?

Chairs !
              The Observer

P.S. Keep up the good work Mr. Tseung.

[Cap-Z-ro]

I'm sure mostly everyone is familiar with the old phrase 'get the lead out', right ?

Now, it only stands to reason that if there was nothing that could be 'lead out' in the first place...then there would certainly not be any kind of  'lead out' to get...and therefore no need for the above referred to phrase.

I hope that brought some clarity to this spirited (and long) debate.

Regards...

[chrisC]

I'm sure mostly everyone is familiar with the old phrase 'get the lead out', right ?

Now, it only stands to reason that if there was nothing that could be 'lead out' in the first place...then there would certainly not be any kind of  'lead out' to get...and therefore no need for the above referred to phrase.

I hope that brought some clarity to this spirited (and long) debate.

Regards...

@ Cap

You're not only intelligent, you're witty too! Good one!

cheers
chrisC