The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Dear Gaby,

I have completed the first draft of the Lee- Tseung Theoretical Pulse Motor. It is in http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=265#265

I have also included guidelines to build the flying saucer. Let us get ready for the cheers and jeers.

Lawrence Tseung
Pulses will lead out strong emotions.   

[Forever]

I have read through the material related to the Lee-Tseung Theoretical Pulse Motor guideline and the flying saucer information. I found it quite easy to follow.

In the Chinese saying(知易è¡Å'難) knowing how to build something is easy, actually building it may meet with unexpected difficulties. I believe it would be a very difficult task to build such a device in one?s garage. It would be better to have an university environment or similar research facilities.

The flying saucer will be much easier if we have a working pulse motor product. If the right opportunity comes, I would like to participate. 

[RoadRunner]

Continued from:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2487

Try to use shorter length (approximately 30 cm).

Understood. (知道了)

Forever Yuen used disc magnets with hole in the middle costing USD0.5.  I believe your magnets are much stronger.

As it happens, my friend has some ceramics with a hole in but he forgot to bring them here over the weekend as he'd intended.
If my results still conflict after using shorter lengths, I'll see if magnets with a hole in make any difference... I don't expect that they will, but then without testing I couldn't be too sure.

Since you are using fishing lines, you can put a fishing pole on top of two Chairs.

Correction - Sm0ky2 used fishing line. I don't have such a thing. I was using string which I had pre-stretched.

There should not be other objects (especially magnetic or iron) to upset the experiment. (I believe Forever used non-stretchable strings.)

I made sure that there was nothing ferrous (or even aluminium) anywhere near the swing.
The chair mentioned in my previous post is a wooden one.

I shall wait for you and others to repeat the experiment.  If the results were still inconclusive, I would ask Ms. Forever Yuen to repeat and video the experiment next Sunday (or during her holidays).

I'd like to see the experiment but I don't think you really need to trouble Yuen Xiaojie.
If I still cannot reproduce her findings after a couple more attempts, then maybe she can demonstrate what a dumbass I am and show me how it's done.

By the way... I saw one of your videos on YouTube...
The one with the weighted float on a chain, being dropped into a tank of water and rising up the column of water.

Now, that's clever thinking but it leads to the question...
"Did you figure a way of retrieving the float from the top of the column and cycling it back down the chain again ?"

You have an airtight gate at the bottom and one at the top, right ?
Thus, you can open either gate without losing the head of water, but not both at the same time.

The RoadRunner..

[ltseung888]

[

Continued from:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2487

Try to use shorter length (approximately 30 cm).

Understood. (知道了)
...

If I still cannot reproduce her findings after a couple more attempts, then maybe she can demonstrate what a dumbass I am and show me how it's done.

I am sure you will succeed.  The students at Tsing Hua University repeated it with no problem.  Looks like you can speak and write Chinese.  Welcome.

By the way... I saw one of your videos on YouTube...
The one with the weighted float on a chain, being dropped into a tank of water and rising up the column of water.

Now, that's clever thinking but it leads to the question...
"Did you figure a way of retrieving the float from the top of the column and cycling it back down the chain again?"

You have an airtight gate at the bottom and one at the top, right ?
Thus, you can open either gate without losing the head of water, but not both at the same time.

The RoadRunner..

If you read the comments from ltseung888 on that video, you would find that the video was a demonstration of a FAILED claim by the inventor.  The inventor "demolished" his house to get his invention installed.  However, he failed to realize that the Float has certain volume.  When the Float is taken out, the water level will fall - with volume equal to that of the Float.

It was displayed as a warning to the experimenters who did not have a solid theory.  The poor inventor "demolished" his house and spent years for a ?scientific lesson.?

Lawrence Tseung
Not knowing the theory Leads Out high Pulse Rates when the phenomenon is explained.

[RoadRunner]

I am sure you will succeed.  The students at Tsing Hua University repeated it with no problem.

I share your optimism... It's not rocket science...


Actually, rocket science, I can manage... Making a magnetic pendulum without busting my magnets... That's a tougher task... 

Looks like you can speak and write Chinese.  Welcome.

Looks can be deceptive...


I only understand a little. I'm probably better at writing it than speaking it... Wo shi ying guo ren !!!
It's not easy for ying guo ren... In English, tone is used to change the emphasis of a sentence, almost never to change the meaning of a word. You can imagine that I usually get my tones completely wrong and chong guo ren look at me as if I've just arrived from Mars... For all the good it does, I might just as well be speaking a Martian dialect !

If you read the comments from ltseung888 on that video, you would find that the video was a demonstration of a FAILED claim by the inventor.  The inventor "demolished" his house to get his invention installed.

Oh... That's sad.
I couldn't read enough of the Chinese subtitles to understand the meaning of the video.
I was going to ask my wife to read them for me.... Ying wei ta shi chong guo ren.

However, he failed to realize that the Float has certain volume.  When the Float is taken out, the water level will fall - with volume equal to that of the Float.

Yes, of course. I hadn't thought of that.... ooops... neither had he.
However, surely all is not completely lost if the net amount of energy gained from the system is more than the amount of energy gained from running that volume of water through a water-wheel...?
That's assuming that he has a pressurised water supply as is the norm for households in the West, and I assume in most developed areas of China too. Not so handy in those rural areas where the only source of water is a well and it needs pumping or carrying !!

Ha... And of course, it's not scalable... There is a limited height to which the atmosphere will support a column of water, so it's not as if he could simply build it taller to gain more energy on the ride down the chain.

There's that problem with 'thought experiments' again.
The guy is in a stiff situation though... He's done all the 'thought experiments' he can.
I guess he didn't have access to complex and accurate simulation software in which he could have modelled his idea... His only recourse would be to build it and try it out... and only then does he find the snag...

I feel sad for the guy. I hope he managed to salvage something workable from the situation.

It was displayed as a warning to the experimenters who did not have a solid theory.  The poor inventor "demolished" his house and spent years for a ?scientific lesson.?

Then, may I suggest that you include a translation of the subtitles in the video description ?
Most Westerners wouldn't recognise one character from another and even those who are studying Chinese may have difficulty in following the subtitles.
Like me, they may look at the video thinking "What a great idea !" and not think past the problem of the loss of volume.

I guess it's becoming fairly obvious now that I'm not Humbugger, but just so that you can share my amusement, I'll send you a message from within YouTube and you will understand why I was saying to Zero that I would leave him with absolutely NO DOUBT that I am who I claim to be.

The RoadRunner..