The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

I read in one of your post from the other forum that this powerful technology of free energy shouldn't be implemented before the world can be at peace.  I agree, however what if it becomes too late, and we destroy the environment.  Obviously if we trash the environment to such a point there will be major consequences.  It seems like this is already occurring to some degree with weather changes, atmospheric changes,  and weird things happening with animals, insects and other lifeforms.  I think one of the hardest thing is not to create free energy but to get it out into the open.  I guess its not such a hard task compared to making peace around the world.  That would take a miracle.  We have been fighting each other throughout history, what could possibly change that around?

We have been talking about controlled, slowly released infinite Cosmic Energy Machines.  Some brilliant readers may have guessed the undiscussed.  Some area 51 type top secret organizations might be implementing them already.

That is why I want to introduce New Order now.  Please see:
http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?t=13

[ltseung888]

Sharing some juicy discussions:

"When you push a stationary pendulum horizontally, it will rise up.  I cannot dispute that.  But I am saying that the energy required to raise up comes from the horizontal force.  Nothing is Lead Out.  This is the conventional teaching."

"Conventional teaching also says a horizontal force cannot do work in the vertical direction unless some kind of machine is used to change its drection?  What kind of machine is hidden behind the simple pendulum?"

"I can accept that we are immersed in gravitational fields.  I can even accept that we are interchanging gravitational energy with one another all the time.  But I cannot accept that the simple pulsed pendulum has a COP of greater than 1."

"I can follow your line of reasoning.  However, if you are right, I have to re-learn everything.  My electrial engineering training tells me that I have to find fuel for my generators.  You are telling me that I can use gravitational energy that is free.  You are telling me that I can even use Electron Motion Energy when I am in outer space.  It was a shock to me when I first read the information.  I am still shaking from that shock."

"You mean that US, USSR, China have been wasting billions on their space programs.  You mean a Flying Saucer with your type of descriptions could replace them all."

"We have been doing Energy Research for over 10 years.  We focused on wind, solar, tidal and other renewable sources of Energy.  What would happen to our funding if your technology is correct?  Does it mean that we have to study and implement your Lee-Tseung theory for us to survive?"

"Even though I do not agree with your theory totally, I consider that this is a worthwhile trip for me."

[gaby de wilde]

Sharing some juicy discussions:

"When you push a stationary pendulum horizontally, it will rise up.  I cannot dispute that.  But I am saying that the energy required to raise up comes from the horizontal force.  Nothing is Lead Out.  This is the conventional teaching."

"Conventional teaching also says a horizontal force cannot do work in the vertical direction unless some kind of machine is used to change its drection?  What kind of machine is hidden behind the simple pendulum?"

"I can accept that we are immersed in gravitational fields.  I can even accept that we are interchanging gravitational energy with one another all the time.  But I cannot accept that the simple pulsed pendulum has a COP of greater than 1."

"I can follow your line of reasoning.  However, if you are right, I have to re-learn everything.  My electrial engineering training tells me that I have to find fuel for my generators.  You are telling me that I can use gravitational energy that is free.  You are telling me that I can even use Electron Motion Energy when I am in outer space.  It was a shock to me when I first read the information.  I am still shaking from that shock."

I had a teacher who would scream at anyone who wasn't one hundred percent sure of what he said. He  didn't just limit this to students. If you would ask him a question after class he would rage about how stupid you are. He would explain everything 2 times with loud voice.

One day I ask him if change of flux is that what powers a transformer. Then what happens if we cut the power at the peek of the wave? Don't we get more flux change that way? And I repeated the drawings he made on the board showing him how much the flux changes. He laughed, I never seen him laugh like that. Then he said he wasn't suppose to teach stuff like that. It appeared very weird to me as I was initially convinced I didn't understand the class. But now he gave me the impression I had magnificently cornered him down using his own words?  WTF? I mean he looked as if he just heard the best joke in his career. He refused to explain and said I understood it more then enough for now. It was probably one of the weirdest conversations I've ever had. The tiran now send me off without answers? WTF?? Why didn't he scream as usual? He was more like hiding behind his desk now? I'm still looking for the answer to this very day.

So far I found all those people building pulse motors... ROFL! Leaves me very little hope to ever find the answer to my erroneous view. Who posted that scope shot with the reed strapped parallel onto the coil? That was exactly the picture I had in mind. Lets search for it. 

"You mean that US, USSR, China have been wasting billions on their space programs.  You mean a Flying Saucer with your type of descriptions could replace them all."

"We have been doing Energy Research for over 10 years.  We focused on wind, solar, tidal and other renewable sources of Energy.  What would happen to our funding if your technology is correct?  Does it mean that we have to study and implement your Lee-Tseung theory for us to survive?"

"Even though I do not agree with your theory totally, I consider that this is a worthwhile trip for me."

[ltseung888]

Greetings all this was given to me by our on line university Author Patrick Kelly

"If I understand Lawrence Tseung's theory correctly, the main "lead-out" of gravitic free-energy is from each IMPACT of a weight (or thrust) in the direction of rotation.  In other words, a smoothly rotating flywheel has no free-energy gain while a pulsed flywheel has serious energy gains.  Yes, providing a weight imbalance will cause the wheel to rotate but for generating serious drive power, the wheel has to be subjected to pulsing.  You see this in the John Bedini scaled up self-runner which has kilowatts of excess power thanks to being driven by a pulsed DC motor, and to a lesser degree in the Adams motor with its lightweight rotor.  The heavier the rotor and the greater its diameter, the greater the free-energy gain from gravity.

If Lawrence's theory is correct, then it is a major step forward in the free-energy scene.  The Chinese developments seem to show that his theory is correct."

Dear Ash,

I almost overlooked your post.  Patrick Kelly is one of the few who grasped the idea.  A smooth rotating flywheel will not lead out gravitational or electron motion energy. An object travelling with x velocity along a straight line will continue forever if there were no external force (Newton's Laws of Motion).  In circular motion, a spinning object with x rpm will spin forever if the centripetal force does not change.  No energy is needed to keep the velocity  or the rpm x!

The Pulse will accelerate the rotation of the cylinder.  There is energy gain in the acceleration. The drawing out of energy by external load or friction will decelerate the rotation of the cylinder.

The gain in energy is partly from the Pulse and partly from the Lead Out energy.

I am glad that the Bedini scaled up self-runner can confirm that.  I shall contact him and produce a win-win.

Thank you for your posting.

Lawrence Tseung
International coorperation Leads Out benefits to the World. My underlining Lead Out and Pulse did have seeds in fertile soil.

[jeffc]

Everyone, I can't speak for others, but I would appreciate if the personal attacks, silly remarks, and insults on this topic come to an end.  I'm not requesting this because of support for Lawrence, but because it personally offends me to have to read such dribble on a web site dedicated to science.  Some of these unfortunate remarks are coming from people who I have come to respect for their intelligent contributions to this community. 

Please, you can disagree, be sceptical, even critical as a part of this process.  But lets not degrade this topic, or any topic on this web site.  If this trend continues here, it can only lead to discouraging and deterring good minds from contributing to an extremely important human endeavour.  The behavior on this topic impacts the overall quality of this site.

Lets moderate our activity, so Stephan won't have to.  And so that this community has a chance to show how a worldwide opensource team can produce amazing innovations.

Regards,
jeffc