The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[FreeEnergy]

funny how you so proudly mention talking about your "brilliant" "experiments" like the "boat on calm water on a sunny day" and the "wire tied to bottle",
but you seem totally unwilling or unable to share the details of these "experiments" with us...

How do these show that "your theory" works?
How does the example of running a boat on solar power demostrate the viability of your hypothesis, and how does it show in what practical manner we can actually extract energy from the gravitational field?

PLEASE finally explain this to us, instead of continually presenting little talks you had with people as "proof". It's very nice that there are apparently people who are convinced your hypothesis is valid even though you apparently do not show them any proof either, but we have been asking you do explain how your dodgy "experiments" prove that we can "lead out" energy from gravity for ages now and you appear to ignore them structurally.

Why do you not post any replies on that? Why do you only post replies that serve to support your side of the story only on the point that people apparently discuss your hypothesis with you, but not on the point of  proving your actual hypothesis itself? Oh, and forking up a bunch of formulae is one thing, but actually presenting a testable setup that proves your formula juggling to result in actual practical output would be the actual proof.
Why do you seem so intent on avoiding actual discussion of experiments that can prove that we can really extract energy from gravity in a perpetually moving system?
You must understand that no matter how many discussion with other (be they existant or not) people you post, as long as you avoid the actual test phase and discussion about it, you do not come across as very trustworthy, sincere, honest, nor cooperative.

I assume you will not reply to this post as you choose to ignore all posts of this nature, but I'd still like to point out that if you keep ignoring this type of posts, it only serves to undermine your own credibility.

I couldn't agree more.

[baybill]

 Mr. Tseung -  You sure put together a nice summary and story on my visit and our discussion on the subject interested to many.  I have been followed-up on the over unity systems and free energy systems on the internet for the past few years and always wonder whether they are real or not. There are many things in this world that we do not understand but always too proud to have an open mind to seek the truth or the knowledge behind the God's creation because of our training, our back ground, or our cultural differences.  As far as I know, no one "today" can explain why and how a tree grows upward! Gravitational force has been with this earth since day 1 (don't know what is day 1 - only the Creator knows) but not until an apple hit on his head - so Newton discovered the gravity! There are many wonderful over unity inventions already exist but no one knows why it works not until someone can come up with the theory to explain it.
     I am sure that there are many, including myself until you explained to me, who do not agree with you but that doesn't mean it is not there.
Please keep up the good work and accept the criticism as the path of progress.

Baybill

[RD Edwards]

The more Lawrence (and his 'friends') post, the more incredulous it gets. I have followed his site and his 'work' for many years, and I am amazed at what has transpired here.
First, why is it so important to convince people on different boards across the world? Why would tseung spend hundreds of posts on here, for what? Thats just on this board. So we know there is a heavy marketing effort going on. For what?
If you have the chinese govt on board, and have patents, and are friends with all the top free energy men in China, then why would you want to even mention that someone nobody knows is coming to your house for proof of what you say? And then when you do tell the story, there is no substance, but only "calm boats on water, and how much fun the beach is?" No.
Mr. Tseung, if this is your marketing effort to convince the world of what you have, then you have failed. You claim to sow seeds, pearls of knowledge that will save us ignorant ones, but the truth is that you do not even know your fellow humans, not at all. For if you did, you would know that simply showing us your device working would free you of all this 'bother', and allow you to pursue further endeavors,  releasing you from this seemingly unwanted diversion.
Thats a very simple thing to do. One thing you have in abundance is certainty of your devices' ability to perform. So it should be very easy to produce a flotation device for instance that turns a little generator. That has not happened, nor will it happen from you.
As the focus now turns from inventor to the reason behind the smoke from the fire, what will we find?

Spreading seeds all over leads to rats....

RD

[Cap-Z-ro]

You realize of course that your years of devotion to Lee's work wood qualify you for a regular or at least a recurring role in his proposed new reality TV show of course?

Talk about being in the right place at the right time.


*pandering for possible production position

[ltseung888]

Mr. Tseung -  You sure put together a nice summary and story on my visit and our discussion on the subject interested to many.  I have been followed-up on the over unity systems and free energy systems on the internet for the past few years and always wonder whether they are real or not.

.....
There are many wonderful over unity inventions already exist but no one knows why it works not until someone can come up with the theory to explain it.
     
.....
I am sure that there are many, including myself until you explained to me, who do not agree with you but that doesn't mean it is not there.
Please keep up the good work and accept the criticism as the path of progress.

Baybill

Dear Mr. Bill Fung,

There are a few significant statements in your post.

(1)   You have followed the development of alternative energy for years.
(2)   You accept that there are wonderful over unity inventions already.
(3)   You read my material but did not agree until I explained to you in person.

I have the following comments to share:
(1)   At one time, in the 1800s, the patent offices were flooded with inventions on paper.  To eliminate the obvious non-working ones, someone thought of applying the Law of Conservation of Energy.  If an inventor could not identify the source of energy of his invention, the invention would be classified as the impossible perpetual motion machine.

Unfortunately, the patent offices and the scientists overlooked or were never taught the phenomena of Lead Out energy.  As an example of Lead Out, energy from gravity could come into the system in a non-obvious fashion.  Now we know that pulsed flywheels can Lead Out gravitational energy. (Some may still disagree.)  If we just stare at the rotating flywheel, we would be at a loss at the source of the extra energy. 

(2)   It is good that you accepted that there are working ?over unity? devices.  Many of these working ?over unity? devices involve rotation of magnets in magnetic fields.

(3)   You read my material from the Internet but did not agree.  After we met, my main explanation to you was the spreadsheet on reply 643 and 758.  As soon as you understood the Ideal Lee-Tseung Pull, you found the concepts very easy and clear.  Everything started to make sense.

I learned much from the meeting.  If the reader did not understand or accept Lead Out, he would be lost.  Or he would disagree.  Hundreds of posts would be junk to him.  Diamonds would be treated as broken glass.