The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Grumpy]

Nikola Tesla "leads out" extra energy by using Lenz's Law.



Excerpt from: ?The Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla?
By Thomas Commerford Martin, 1894, Page 488

Mr. Tesla also described a very interesting phenomenon which he illustrated by an experiment.  By means of this new apparatus, he is able to produce an alternating current in which the EMF of the impulses in one direction preponderates over that of those in the other, so that there is produced the effect of a direct current. In fact he expressed the hope that these currents would be capable of application in many instances, serving as direct currents. The principle involved in this preponderating EMF. 
He explains in this way: Suppose a conductor is moved into the magnetic field and then suddenly withdrawn. If the current is not retarded, then the work performed will be a mere fractional one; but if the current is retarded, then the magnetic field acts as a spring:. Imagine that the motion of the conductor is arrested by the current generated, and that at the instant when it stops to move into the field, there is still the maximum current flowing in the conductor; then this current will, according to Lenz?s law, drive the conductor out of the field again, and if the conductor has no resistance, then it would leave the field with the velocity it entered it. Now it is clear that if, instead of simply depending on the current to drive the conductor out of the field, the mechanically applied force is so timed that it helps the conductor to get out of the field, then it might leave the field with higher velocity than it entered it, and thus one impulse is made to preponderate in EMF over the other.
With a current of this nature, Mr. Tesla energized magnets strongly, and performed many interesting experiments bearing out the fact that one of the current impulses preponderates. Among them was one in which he attached to his oscillator a ring magnet with a small air gap between the poles. This magnet was oscillated up and down 80 times a second. A copper disc, when inserted within the air gap of the ring magnet, was brought into rapid rotation. Mr. Tesla remarked that this experiment also seemed to demonstrate that the lines of flow of current through a metallic mass are disturbed by the presence of a magnet in a manner quite independently of the so-called Hall effect. He showed also a very interesting method of making a connection with the oscillating magnet. This was accomplished by attaching to the magnet small insulated steel rods, and connecting to these rods the ends of the energizing coil. As the magnet was vibrated, stationary nodes were produced in the steel rods, and at these points the terminals of a direct current source were attached. Mr. Tesla also pointed out that one of the uses of currents, such as those produced in his apparatus, would be to select any given one of a number of devices connected to the same circuit by picking out the vibration by resonance. There is indeed little doubt that with Mr. Tesla?s devices, harmonic and synchronous telegraphy will receive a fresh impetus, and vast possibilities are again opened up.
Mr. Tesla was very much elated over his latest achievements, and said that he hoped that in the hands of practical, as well as scientific men, the devices described by him would yield important results. He laid special stress on the facility now afforded for
investigating the effect of mechanical vibration in all directions, and also showed that he had observed a number of facts in connection with iron cores.

[chrisC]

Thank you ChrisC for your continued insult training.

I come to expect it almost like reflex action.

Did you read 643 and 758?

Have you asked your friends knowledgeable in Physics to read them?

Regards,

Lawrence

Lawrence,
Personally I won't even touch your postulates with a 10 foot pole. Why? Because at this stage you really are a nobody in the scientific sense of the word. If you had something that is worthy of real OU, the scientific community will come knocking on your door. You don't even need to go to China and to Tsinghua to drum up your support. Did any important person come forward from the world press or technical magazines or TV stations or even the local Hong Kong University Physics department chair come congratulate you on your earth shattering discovery? How come the answer is 'No'?

Remember Pons and Fleishman? One of those people came from Southampton University. Or are you too old to remember? Did you learn anything from them blowing smoke without proper scientific documentation and verifiable proofs?

Oh, by the way, I see in your published photos, you're always wearing a hat of some sort? Are you trying to hide a bald patch, like you're trying to cover some truths that if unearthed, would be embarrassing in your Lead Out crap theories?

Sorry to burst your bubble but you're still an amateur by any standards. That's your insult training episode for today.

have a good day

chrisC

[gaby de wilde]

Dear Mr. Tseung,

I am a Physics Teacher with a B.Sc. in Physics.  One of my students brought your Lee-Tseung theory to my attention.  After some checking, I know that your spreadsheet calculation is correct.  However, may I suggest some improved teaching techniques.

(1)   When you quote Work Done = Force x Displacement (vector mathematics), you already lost half of your audience on the Internet.
(2)   Since that is the central point of your argument, you should explain it in more detail.
(3)   I suggest using the following diagram:
(In the attached file)

My students always had a hard time understanding negative work. The correct explanation should be no work is done but energy is stored in the system.  In your spreadsheet, the weight of the pendulum bob F1g is a force in the downward direction.  The resultant displacement is in the upward direction.  The correct physics interpretation should be no work was done by the weight F1g but energy had been stored in the pendulum system.

I hope I have not caused more confusion to your forum members.  This is for your attention only.  You may decide whether you want to post it.

Yours truly,
XXX

Dear XXX,

Thank you for your advice.  I want you to help to teach basic physics to the many seeds I sowed.  You have better experience and technique than me.  Hopefully with your help, a few more seeds would grow.  Please post directly.

Lawrence Tseung
A professional physics teacher Leads Out more saved seeds (or souls)!

This is good



btw

Where are those replies 643 and 758 you keep talking about?

[Grumpy]

Where are those replies 643 and 758 you keep talking about?

[shruggedatlas]

Tseung: ?The square wheel by itself without any attachment could rotate up to 16 minutes.  When we attached the two cylinders of 80% sand, we could get a rotational time of 30 minutes.  The sand moved inside the tube, providing the pulse.?

I did find one testable claim in all of what Tseung wrote.  See above quote.  I do not actually believe that this can happen, so if it does, that would be pretty amazing to me.  My prediction is that the moving sand will only hinder the wheel's rotation. 

The only thing that maybe was missed is that to have a proper test, there should be we exact same weights attached in the control experiment, but not containing sand.  Or perhaps for simplicity and to assure equal weight, fill empty space with cotton to prevent sand from moving.

What do you guys think?