The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Kul_ash]

Dear Kul-Ash,

Please think about revising your above paragraph. 

?O level Physics? demands the calculation of work done by the string based on its tension (force) and displacement.  We can divide the work into vertical and horizontal components.  The vertical work is calculated from the vertical component (T1cos(a) or Mg, 60 units) of the Tension times the increase in height dH.  This is positive work done by the string.

The horizontal work is calculated from the horizontal component (T1sin(a) or F, 10 units) times the horizontal displacement ?dX.  This is negative work or energy supplied by the horizontal force F to be stored in the pendulum system.

Please try to revise your above paragraph with the vigorous physics and mathematics.  Please analyze the Three Forces, the resultant Displacement, the Work done and Energy spent or stored.  I am confident the Indian way of doing the analysis will give the same result as the Chinese way if ?O Level Physics? were taught properly in both Countries.

You may even try the more complex case of a non-perfect horizontal force.  (Which I intend to do some time later for the ideal Lee-Tseung Pull.)  You can demonstrate your physics and mathematics skills in reproducing that analysis.  Hint: it is in spreadsheet form already in one of the previous Tseung posts.

ha ha ha! Let me ask you step by step questions. Please answer them:

1. Initial position. T = mg. String is perfectly vertical. Now how will the string move to angle theta? Say I want to move string to angle of 5 deg. How should I move it?

[ltseung888]

Dear Kul_ash,

In case you missed it, see ideal.zip in the previous post by Top Gun.

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
? Reply #2039 on: April 03, 2008, 12:12:18 AM ?

I just noted that only 6 hits were registered.  Only the ones very serious and good in physics and mathematics would be able to follow.

I look forward to Top Gun explaining this to the Forum Members or the General Public.

[Koen1]

@Kul_ash

You're not seriously going to go over the stuff again, are you?
It seems clear that Larry Top Gun Forever Young Tseung interprets
the tension in the string as energy that gravity freely gives and can be
used somehow, even though he is apparently totally unable to demonstrate
how he wants to get that energy out.
Yes, he keeps bringing up a "horizontal pull" but that is obviously nonsense,
as adding extra energy by pulling (or pushing) the pendulum is very
obviously not the same thing as extracting energy from that pendulum.
That combined with the huge number of errors in his assumptions, his
calculations and his interpretations of these in my opinion clearly shows
that he doesn't know what he's talking about and is distracting us all
with his complete bullshit.
Lawrence is a nobody trying to gain fame in the OU scene and taking
advantage of the fact that most OU fans are too polite and civil to just
tell him to go stick his nonsense where the sun don't shine and actually
listen to his constant parade of fantasies.

[Kul_ash]

Dear Kul-Ash,

Please think about revising your above paragraph. 

?O level Physics? demands the calculation of work done by the string based on its tension (force) and displacement.  We can divide the work into vertical and horizontal components.  The vertical work is calculated from the vertical component (T1cos(a) or Mg, 60 units) of the Tension times the increase in height dH.  This is positive work done by the string.

The horizontal work is calculated from the horizontal component (T1sin(a) or F, 10 units) times the horizontal displacement ?dX.  This is negative work or energy supplied by the horizontal force F to be stored in the pendulum system.

Please try to revise your above paragraph with the vigorous physics and mathematics.  Please analyze the Three Forces, the resultant Displacement, the Work done and Energy spent or stored.  I am confident the Indian way of doing the analysis will give the same result as the Chinese way if ?O Level Physics? were taught properly in both Countries.

You may even try the more complex case of a non-perfect horizontal force.  (Which I intend to do some time later for the ideal Lee-Tseung Pull.)  You can demonstrate your physics and mathematics skills in reproducing that analysis.  Hint: it is in spreadsheet form already in one of the previous Tseung posts.

Dear Toppy
In other words what I am asking is, if you like so much to resolve forces, why don't you resolve them at the initial position also when you first apply the force? I never seen any such analysis except your flawed diagrams. Please do the parellelogram analysis at the starting position.

[WilbyInebriated]

still avoiding backing up your claims with substance hans?