Molina Martinez patent

[HopeForHumanity]

Yes, yes

I have been arguing the same thing to people, i was just wondering if he has run tests on it to see if the collision really does produce anything. I know, isn't it silly, all those theories contradicting eachother?

[Alberto Molina M.]

Paul Andrulis is right. Virtual photons are not called like that because they don?t exist. They do exist but have particular properties. This link could be useful. 
http://www.fnal.gov/pub/inquiring/questions/virtual_photons_1.html
 
Photons collisions are also real, not a theory. There is abundant literature about this. You can search Google for ?photon-photon collisions?.

Best regards,

Alberto Molina M.

[martinzurix]

if i understand properly ...  energy produced from collision of photons is bigger than used for collision ??

[HopeForHumanity]

Now this is something interesting I just thought of. Arn't black holes natural photon collision centers? The photon sphere surrounding a black hole has to give off these reactions because the density of photons being acheived that this point is incredible. Enough photon collision is suppose to give off entire particle sets to naturaly form into hydrogen atoms. This looks like the jackpot in terms of explaining the amount of hyrogen in our universe. Could it be these blackholes are recycling the energy created back into matter?

[pauldude000]

@ Alberto M.

It actually makes sense to me. Let me explain why. I will have to use some math, so I apologize if I lose anyone here.

Note: ^2 = "squared" and sqrt() = square root

To say E=MC^2 for matter at rest, or E=(MC^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) with Lorentzian transformations applied for motion, or E=hf for electromagnetic energy, is somewhat cryptical. To state that the energy E referenced is actually the same form, or equivalent, then E=E.

What that means is that (MC^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = hf. It has to be true, or E is not equivalent. In simpler terms, the property known as "energy" (E) is not "energy".

Therefore if we assume that E is truly = E, we may conclude from this that Mass itself is a function of frequency of an energy, since C and h (plank's constant) are actually constant numbers represented by symbolic form.

If mass is a function of energy frequency, then mass may well be transformed to either an increase of either frequency or energy, and vice-versa.

Now, also consider that E^2 = momentum^2 + M^2, or E= sqrt(momentum^2 + M^2)

Guess what, E = E (actually E^2 = E^2) principle yet again.......

In this we can state hf(MC^2/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)) = momentum^2 + M^2

We ten note that momentum is then a relation of a mass frequency in motion, which is true.

This then demonstrates that mass is not some quantity solely owned by "matter", and that "matter" is but another representation, form, or aspect of energy.

Otherwise, E=mc^2 would not be applicable to matter, as it's derivations are based upon ELECTROMAGNETIC formula. (Note the application of the Lorentzian transformations.)

Therefore, it should come as no shock to anyone that energy can manifest itself as any of the forms, or all of the forms, with a change in any of the functional parts of the base form.

Therefore, collision of photons, would equal a change in momentum or possibly even frequency, which might create particles, or release energy of various forms.

Paul Andrulis