Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



New video on site of possible OU test fixture

Started by Butch, August 14, 2007, 06:23:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

psychopath

Quote from: nwman on August 16, 2007, 03:43:46 PM
Quote from: acp on August 16, 2007, 12:49:21 PM
@Omnibus,

Can you please provide a link where you show conclusively that the SMOT violates CoE.

Sorry if this is alraedy posted somewhere else, but I don't find it on this forum. Thanks.

Albert

I too would like to see this!

Tim

Here is a video that shows what he means:

http://jlnlabs.imars.com/atelab/videos/smotnrg320.avi

The video shows that even if you do not have a superior loop, you can make use of that extra energy. As you can see, the person in the video does not give the ball a headstart or an initial kick, he simply removes the ruler.

Some sceptics claim that you put in the energy when placing the ball on the ramp. This is not true, and we even have evidence in this video. You see, even if it did take up energy to place the ball there, the ball was placed the same way once the magnets were removed, so the hand still put in the same energy(assuming it does), yet the ball traveled further when the magnets wre present.

I think this DOES prove that a SMOT violates CoE! Same ramp, same person, only difference is the magnets!


Omnibus

In addition to what @psychopath says, here?s an even more convincing video conclusively proving that SMOT violates CoE:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2383887636280790847

hartiberlin

Quote from: Omnibus on August 17, 2007, 06:04:16 AM
In addition to what @psychopath says, here?s an even more convincing video conclusively proving that SMOT violates CoE:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2383887636280790847

Video not found.

Did you mean this one ?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5163427245750490858

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

Humbugger

Quote from: hartiberlin on August 17, 2007, 06:49:32 AM
Quote from: Omnibus on August 17, 2007, 06:04:16 AM
In addition to what @psychopath says, here?s an even more convincing video conclusively proving that SMOT violates CoE:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2383887636280790847

Video not found.

Did you mean this one ?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5163427245750490858

Regards, Stefan.


Both videos come up no problem for me...how either proves a CoE violation is not self-explanatory to me, however.  All I get is that magnets pull on steel balls.  I already knew that. 

Omnibus

@Stefan,

The link to the magnetic propulsor you gave avove also demonstrates a device which violates CoE. However, the first video in my previous posting is actually of a SMOT.