Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[Jamie]

@ xboxHacker

I think I figured out why the gating is not working correctly. Pin 4 needs between 0.2 and 0.7 volts to hold the output off. When you apply a higher voltage it holds it on. Then you drop to 0 volts at pin 4 and it resets the whole pulse cycle. This would make the length of the Gating 555, pin 3, ON state irrelevent, since the reseting is done while swithing to OFF. Does that make Sense?

[Jamie]

I don't think the labels Frequency and Mark Space are accurate in the D14 circuit diagrams. Both pots control Frequency and Both contribute to Mark/Space.

Mark/Space -    

Mark/Space is a ratio measurement. Mark being the ON state of a pulse, and Space being the OFF state between the pulses in a square wave. This means that if you have a square wave that's high for 3 seconds and off for 1 second you have a 3 second Mark(ON) to 1 second Space(OFF) ratio or 3/1. In the lawton circuit both pots contribute to the mark space because one controls Mark and one controls Space.

Frequency -   

The number of repetitions per unit time of a complete waveform. Frequency is therefore equal to Mark + Space, because a Mark and a Space completes a full cycle.

Here is how I think the pots would be better labeled:
(Note: I replaced both pots on the pulse chip with one to produce a 50% duty cycle which Meyers calls for in U.S. patent # 4,936,961.)

[xbox hacker]

@ xboxHacker

I think I figured out why the gating is not working correctly. Pin 4 needs between 0.2 and 0.7 volts to hold the output off. When you apply a higher voltage it holds it on. Then you drop to 0 volts at pin 4 and it resets the whole pulse cycle. This would make the length of the Gating 555, pin 3, ON state irrelevent, since the reseting is done while swithing to OFF. Does that make Sense?

Yes it does..So just make the voltage to pin 4 less, like  0.7?

[Jamie]

Don't get me wrong I think it works the way it's supposed to, but I thought you were supposed to be able to adjust the gating length.

[fever16]

@Kineticon
thanks for the reply i'll do that.

iam quite worried abt one more thing guys.what ever the research is done on WFC till now(on different forums ) is mostly during end of 2007 and beginning of 2008.after that i don't see any impressive results.is that mean people start thinking that this technology is not going to work? 
bcz most users like hydrocars,steev(from waterfuelcel-com),ashtweth(and others) did quite good research.but i don't see any further developments from them.
is that mean
the secret  is already cracked
or Ravi's issue with MIB's caused this silence
or something else?