Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

Started by wattsup, September 09, 2007, 12:42:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rakarskiy

The engine shown in the video can not be - the output is more than one.
The whole effect in the overclocked mass. Only for a system on one shaft, I'm not sure that these flywheels are completely suitable.

JulesP

Hi there,

I have read with interest this 12 year post as a flywheel system is something I am ready to look into as an 'open system' researcher based in the UK. From what I can see various replication attempts at Chas Campbells original device have failed to reproduce what he says it did. I don't know how much attention has been paid to the apparently necessary pulsing of the flywheel, by electronic or loose belt methods which, it is suggested, Lead Out gravitational energy, but has any one been able to communicate with Campbell himself to discuss why replication has not been successful?

I was looking at one video from 2012 by Sohail Anjum (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98aiISB2DNw) who 'demonstrates' success - has he been able to share any useful info?

Incidentally, one of my latest projects was an attempt at a small scale replication of the William Skinner Gravity Power device. I did not get a CoP>1 but there may be a good reason for that on a small scale. Anyone interested can see my 4 pager report (attached) and a video at my Dropbox at: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bws0akodif0dkep/AAAozinnUABXKk6hfIdN6zVZa?dl=0

Regards,

Julian

Toolofcortex

There was a man here by the name of libra_spirit, he made a good post.

But please approach this as a high gain, low probability time investment and dont design your life around this working.

Now Rakarsky has some good documents, matbe he can send them to you for free.

JulesP


Toolofcortex

Please try the idea of a hidden eccentric, thus allowing pulley tension to be varied.

A motor with a solid connection to a flywheel (input accumulator), an intermediate wheel with shifting that is constantly disconnecting and reconnecting, and a final grand wheel, with possible gearing for this particular wheel.

Perhaps you can make a squeeze wheel underneath, that bounces on the pulley and acts as a limit.

You could possible make this symetric or phase controlled almost, and double your input with a second motor, to "pulse on a pulse". Perhas even magnets in a bedini-esque fasion.

But magnets suck compared to flywheels. Flywheels are like the perfect pulse device, they have absolutely "zero output impedance" , not even .1 ohms like batteries.

Anyways, play with such things. Plan ahead, be flexible. Use telemetry, sensors, encoders, know the timing diagram of it, that way you can be creative.

You are building a test bench, you are not replicating a "insert name" device.

Good luck.