Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Lords of the Ring 2

Started by hartiberlin, September 21, 2007, 09:14:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Magluvin

Hey GK
So would the spark gap be across the diode?
Mags

giantkiller

Quote from: Magluvin on May 15, 2022, 01:35:10 PM
Hey GK
So would the spark gap be across the diode?
Mags
Across the diode would include the inductor and the cap on the other side of the current loop.
The diodes would cause a one way dead short across the spark gap that would not allow the charge pump to build as much needed to bridge ionize the gap. This I have played with quite a bit moving the connection points attempting to keep the spark from happening. Using microwave transformers or ignition coils as the simplest way to stick inductors into the charge pump. Keep the input voltage low and alter the frequency to moving the incoming values around and through the operating window. Follow Tesla coil tuning guides to secure equipment from failures via EMP or discharges. And this is the step where caution is needed. This is the part of the schematic that is purposely left out due to liability.

In this charge pump the inductive storage is on both sides.
The input side is a step up and the output side is a step up with the charge pump in the middle.
The bleeder resistor is just like the resistors across the large caps in the LTPU.
The LTPU shows two large charge pumps but only one spark gap as per the one open fuse and one open fuse holder in the rear.The parts are there in the many photos we have. Twist connections around the configuration.
So one can see with two large charge pumps and EMP discharges the testing at this point is very dangerous. The beginning point for me was the GK4 as this was an open face microwave transformer of sorts. 48v at 5khz was enough to prove this stage was valid. The wrap around circuitry, physical configuration and tuning were the next goals.Discharges are to be avoided if not handled correctly. This is the one conversation I wish I could have with SM. Containment while designing. I burnt a lot of equipment. The TPU is circuitry just like the stun gun design. SM stated that all must reside inside. What a clue that was. The charge. He also stated that if you ground the center you lose it.
The TPU is an open air stun gun/ Armstrong operator with the discharge buried inside. This is the exact opposite of the other charge pumps we see where the circuitry is inside and the discharge is external. I refer back to the High Q multiplier.
The oscillations were transmitted and captured via directional ring antenna.
Build a charge pump from uwave or ignition coils then create a feed back to retrigger the oscillations.
The neighborhood will shut down.This answer was given too by his demos in the house on the hill by the power towers. I think he used those to camouflage the signature.

Reiyuki

Quote from: Magluvin on May 15, 2022, 01:35:10 PM
Hey GK
So would the spark gap be across the diode?
Mags
Simpler diagram that seems to retain all of the critical features.

Magluvin

Im not seeing the potential function of the spark gap where you have depicted it Rei.  That wouldnt discharge the cap into an action that does anything as there is no connection to the collector circuit by the top side of that cap. The cap would still remain charged.
Also by eliminating the armature side( top terminal) of the relay to the left, makes it non functional also as to the original circuit.
If the fe  or iron wire in the collector circuit induces the collector coil, then the logical spark discharge would be here on the right in green.
Mags

Magluvin

Just guessing on my part also.   ;) Mags