SMOT! - (previously about the OC MPMM)

[tinu]

I have a very good reason called intellect to say what I say. There is another reason called science. Another one called history.
One would invoke ?human nature? or ?greed? or ?desire for popularity?. But that?s another story.

Watch again these two excellent movies:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oyw5GKmOF64
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duZtNZZpNEc

I keep my views.
Not only xpenzif?s device is fake. So is Al?s, like I?ve already said at the beginning of this thread.
Time will confirm.

Tinu

[rice]

is there any way to prevent omnibus from cluttering this thread?  perhaps limit his amount of reply per day.  i am sure i am not the only one who is sick of his blabber. hartiberlin can you do anything about this?

[Omnibus]

@tinu,

All of it may or may not be fake.You, however, have no reason to assert it's a fake. Your intelect is not the intelect of God to invoke it as an argument, let alone bring history as an argument. Bringing such arguments confirms you have no idea how science works. Science puts reproducible experiment first and there is one such experiment already proving violation of CoE which is the one I've already analyzed and proved beyond doubt that produces energy out of nothing. This also proves that the motors we're talking about are possible. If these two are fake there will inevitably be a real one constructed one day. As far as whether or not these motors are fake, we still don't know yet because reproductions of both @xpenzif's and @alsetalonkin's are still on the way.

[Omnibus]

@rice,

You and the likes of you who contribute nothing to the discussion at hand should be prevented from cluttering the thread.

[tinu]

Science puts reproducible experiment first...

Show it. Is there any reproducible OU experiment? Nope.

...violation of CoE which is the one I've already analyzed and proved beyond doubt ...

Your analysis is flawed.
I will not spend any more time to show your mistakes. It?s not worth the time. The burden is on you.

Cheers,
Tinu