Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[stephenafreter]

14 Mhz background noise ... Radio amateur band ?!

1-The Yagi antenna is the most popular directional array on the radio amateur bands from 14MHz through VHF and UHF where tv is. It is sometimes seen on the 30 and 40 meter bands too.

2- GENERAL TELEVISION FREQUENCIES :
Sub CATV Band - T7 - T13   = 7 - 48 MHz
T8 = 13 MHz
quote:
"CATV has channels with frequencies below channel 2. They are designated T-7 (tee seven or tee dash seven) through T-14 and are usually used for transmission in the reverse direction. If your local city council meeting is broadcast live, the camera is being modulated onto one of those T channels and sent back up to the cable system headend whereupon it is broadcast outbound on the community cable access channel." from http://www.chem.hawaii.edu/uham/catvfreq.html

3- Kanzius frequency =  13.56 MHz

4- ISM band = Center frequency 13.560 MHz
quote 1 :
The industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) radio bands are radio bands (portions of the radio spectrum) reserved internationally for the use of radio frequency (RF) energy for industrial, scientific and medical purposes other than communications. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISM_band
quote 2 :
The ISM bands are also widely used for Radio-frequency identification (RFID) applications with the most commonly used band being the 13.56 MHz band used by systems compliant with ISO/IEC 14443 including those used by biometric passports and contactless smart cards.

[Wolfgang29]

@ Conradelektro, and all

About the circuit, it's supposed to be very similar to the SEC 18 from what I understand, but with a removal of the transistor (MPSA06 in our case), as well as a removal of the 1 MOhm resistor. One can keep the transistor provided he detach the Base (?) leg of the transistor. Or on can also use a diode in place of the transistor, If I'm not mistaken,not sure of diode polarity. Also tuning the amount of mass (floating ground i believe) is important to the function of the circuit. Does anyone have a schemy of a SEC 18? That would be super helpful in all of us replicating the PSEC. This seems simple enough to at least build. the hard part may be tuning, but with this type of thing it is surely worth it. Also, watch the video of Dr. Stiffler charging and discharging a capacitor, Imagine then coupling that discharge with a timed captret (can to positive) based discharge in addition to the normal discharge. powerful stuff. Thanks all!

[conradelektro]

@stephenafreter: thank you for providing the info about the 13 - 14 MHz range. I wanted to find just that.

@Wolfgang29: as far as I understand, removing the base of the transistor in a transistor oscillation circuit stops the oscillation. It might still somehow function as a rectifier in case an oscillation is fed into the circuit e.g. by an antenna.

But I always find it pretty useless when someone shows a video or reports a finding without providing the details. Without the schematics and details of the components no useful experiments and no intelligent discussions are possible.

So, I wait till Dr.Stiffler comes forward with useful info. If he does not want to do that, fine, what can you do besides forgetting the whole thing? The thread has 197 pages without telling anything but claims and riddles.

"Hey, look at my videos and read what great thing I have built, but I will not tell you what it is!"

Greetings, Conrad

[WilbyInebriated]

as far as I understand, removing the base of the transistor in a transistor oscillation circuit stops the oscillation. It might still somehow function as a rectifier in case an oscillation is fed into the circuit e.g. by an antenna.

regarding the base of the transistor... see the 'esaki effect'.

But I always find it pretty useless when someone shows a video or reports a finding without providing the details. Without the schematics and details of the components no useful experiments and no intelligent discussions are possible.

schematics and details of the components have been provided...  useful experiments and intelligent discussions have ensued. check your reading and comprehension skills...

So, I wait till Dr.Stiffler comes forward with useful info. If he does not want to do that, fine, what can you do besides forgetting the whole thing? The thread has 197 pages without telling anything but claims and riddles.

"Hey, look at my videos and read what great thing I have built, but I will not tell you what it is!"

Greetings, Conrad

stiffler has already come forward with more than enough info... but it's kind of cumulative. perhaps you should learn to crawl before you attempt to run.

[dimbulb]

The spatial coherent (RF) is a field of science like spatial coherent (optical) however there are major differences.
There are many different circuits and this may be confusing. There are few differences from SEC15 and SEC18
The PSEC shows another arangement, The circuits have different charecteristecs, it can be your choice.

Again looking at this science field of Spatial coherence, there are no books written yet. The books on optical spatial coherence
are a few,  and the approach was from physics. The Stiffler SEC approach is electronic radio engineering and efforts are to work towards
physics.  So you can imagine the frustration.  At this point the physics work needs to happen, the meaningful discussion
of a field of science is better built on fact rather than speculation. Imagine trying to get a physics professional read garbage
posted links that make no sense and are not related. The forum encourages an exchange but what happens when it succeeds.

I find the complaints unfounded as I see video close ups, diagrams pdf documentation. Yes I agree we are used to
standard data sheets and part numbers but a little work you can build this if you have a spectrum analyzer
and start with the SEC 15 you would quickly find matching spectrum. The tolerances need to be exact and this project
is more for the advanced level. This is why there has been little physics help. The field is new and you learn to do this
by the seat of your pants. And no there are no hidden transmitters, they would show on the spec analyzer.

It is unfortunate that he does'nt ship the boards out of the U.S.A, I am not sure of all the reasons the later versions
disclosure was not exacting but could be figured out.  As an open source project the basic information was made available.
It is evident that others could replicate the project. In my notebook I collected all the pdfs and circuits I could find and download
the videos, It is important to do this.  With the info make nice circuit boards and get the right parts.
much sucess to you, special thanks to those contributing and hosting.