Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

Started by hartiberlin, October 11, 2007, 05:28:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 25 Guests are viewing this topic.

dean_mcgowan

Quote from: HopeForHumanity on December 03, 2007, 01:51:12 AM
Quote from: dean_mcgowan on December 03, 2007, 01:44:58 AM
And another point ...

Has anyone quantitatively measured the promoted OU in light generated that is the basis for all of this hocus pocus speculation, or is better to just keep sticking your heads in the sand and "BELIEVING" you are on to something. It may be a better more efficient light bulb, and if so congratulations but no one seems to be doing any serious measurements. You defend this by saying its not measurable by conventional means, yet using the lights to heat a litre of water a specific amount  over a specific time should give a good indication of the amount of energy in the system.

A simple test  ? does anyone else have any other ideas of how to quantify the solution.

I don't believe that a LED heating water would be a greate way to measure energy; it isn't accurate enough...

JonesBeene does exactly what you have done .. make "the test" a bridge too far and then goes on to exclaim how this is going to be a revolution. I suggest a valid  test that would give you a ball park figure which in my opinion would be enough to indicate if you were close to over unity or not .. and you just shoot it down so you can go on "believing" what you so obviously need to believe

... me Erratic? LOL .. is that the best you can do .. some half arsed personal assault. Go ahead .. quote everything I have said .. summarise  me as an individual ... whatever .. at least my real name is there with my real words. No Hope ...



HopeForHumanity

Quote from: dean_mcgowan on December 03, 2007, 01:59:46 AM
Quote from: HopeForHumanity on December 03, 2007, 01:51:12 AM
Quote from: dean_mcgowan on December 03, 2007, 01:44:58 AM
And another point ...

Has anyone quantitatively measured the promoted OU in light generated that is the basis for all of this hocus pocus speculation, or is better to just keep sticking your heads in the sand and "BELIEVING" you are on to something. It may be a better more efficient light bulb, and if so congratulations but no one seems to be doing any serious measurements. You defend this by saying its not measurable by conventional means, yet using the lights to heat a litre of water a specific amount  over a specific time should give a good indication of the amount of energy in the system.

A simple test  ? does anyone else have any other ideas of how to quantify the solution.

I don't believe that a LED heating water would be a greate way to measure energy; it isn't accurate enough...

JonesBeene does exactly what you have done .. make "the test" a bridge too far and then goes on to exclaim how this is going to be a revolution. I suggest a valid  test that would give you a ball park figure which in my opinion would be enough to indicate if you were close to over unity or not .. and you just shoot it down so you can go on "believing" what you so obviously need to believe

... me Erratic? LOL .. is that the best you can do .. some half arsed personal assault. Go ahead .. quote everything I have said .. summarise  me as an individual ... whatever .. at least my real name is there with my real words. No Hope ...




Calm the F*** down... You take everything as a personal insult, you some how connect stealing and unconclusive experiments to be the same thing, and you attack people with sarcasm... Do you understand now why some people would believe you to be erratic??? Do you want some one to really personaly attack you? Arguing is fun at night, especialy when your bored, so I would suggest NOT continuing for the sake of sanity.
Ron Paul is internet overunity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXnBZd4nyWk

WE MUST STOP THIS! Free energy is being surpressed because of it!

Pirate88179

See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

dean_mcgowan

Quote from: HopeForHumanity on December 03, 2007, 02:16:03 AM
Quote from: dean_mcgowan on December 03, 2007, 01:59:46 AM
Quote from: HopeForHumanity on December 03, 2007, 01:51:12 AM
Quote from: dean_mcgowan on December 03, 2007, 01:44:58 AM
And another point ...

Has anyone quantitatively measured the promoted OU in light generated that is the basis for all of this hocus pocus speculation, or is better to just keep sticking your heads in the sand and "BELIEVING" you are on to something. It may be a better more efficient light bulb, and if so congratulations but no one seems to be doing any serious measurements. You defend this by saying its not measurable by conventional means, yet using the lights to heat a litre of water a specific amount  over a specific time should give a good indication of the amount of energy in the system.

A simple test  ? does anyone else have any other ideas of how to quantify the solution.

I don't believe that a LED heating water would be a greate way to measure energy; it isn't accurate enough...

JonesBeene does exactly what you have done .. make "the test" a bridge too far and then goes on to exclaim how this is going to be a revolution. I suggest a valid  test that would give you a ball park figure which in my opinion would be enough to indicate if you were close to over unity or not .. and you just shoot it down so you can go on "believing" what you so obviously need to believe

... me Erratic? LOL .. is that the best you can do .. some half arsed personal assault. Go ahead .. quote everything I have said .. summarise  me as an individual ... whatever .. at least my real name is there with my real words. No Hope ...




Calm the F*** down... You take everything as a personal insult, you some how connect stealing and unconclusive experiments to be the same thing, and you attack people with sarcasm... Do you understand now why some people would believe you to be erratic??? Do you want some one to really personaly attack you? Arguing is fun at night, especialy when your bored, so I would suggest NOT continuing for the sake of sanity.

Calm down yourself .. and explain to me why simple calorimetry would not suffice as a reasonable test ?