Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

Started by Localjoe, October 19, 2007, 02:42:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

nievesoliveras

Quote from: lasersaber on September 02, 2010, 08:41:05 AM
The rotor was not centered because that was the first place I ever got the rotor working really well on a NS coil.  I since have perfected this to a much higher level.

My question is: did you connected the reed switch to the start and end of one of the coils?

Jesus

Mk1

@jesus

Hi ! nice to see you around , the switch is connected one end of one wire and the the other end of the other wire .

Mark

nievesoliveras

Quote from: Mk1 on September 02, 2010, 02:05:01 PM
@jesus

Hi ! nice to see you around , the switch is connected one end of one wire and the the other end of the other wire .

Mark

Thank you @mk1!
Of course! I forgot that it is not a coil, it is a battery!

Jesus

FrozenWaterLab

@ Jeanna
Quote
I saw in the latest video I made an extension of the time the rotor stayed going well beyond the time it rotated when it was away from the coil. It was not connected to the rotor.
I thought it was too subjective to count it, but after rereading the gb patent, I really think this is an important way to go.
End Quote

Are you talking about the rotor spinning without the switch?
Are you thinking the coil might make it spin on it's own?

Quote from: IotaYodi on September 01, 2010, 07:05:15 AM
One of the possibility's with 2 units is having them adjacent to each other using each others collapsing fields to sustain operation eliminating the reed switch and rotor once its started. Or the rotor anyway.
Perhaps two coils would cause alt spin force? Is this the type of thing your meaning IY ?
FrznWtr

IotaYodi

QuotePerhaps two coils would cause alt spin force? Is this the type of thing your meaning IY ? FrznWtr
No. The collapsing magnetic field on #1 coil would induce current into #2 coil. When #2 coils magnetic field collapsed it would induce current into #1 coil and so on. One would have to be started first. You would probably want 2 identical cores including the windings to keep a balance between the two but maybe not. Im also thinking that a 3rd coil with a secondary at a distance with larger wire (more current) could be tied in someway. The first 2 coils could be your higher voltage which means smaller wires to wind. Even magnet wire might work. If there is enough current off coil #3 it may be possible to charge a low voltage battery that runs a pulse circuit whose frequency can be adjusted and fed back into coil #1. This might throw more radiant energy into the mix as well as sustain operation. A balance act for sure. First trick is to get the first 2 coils to cycle back and forth somehow.
What I know I know!
Its what I don't know that's a problem!