Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Meyer's WFC concept analysed

Started by Farrah Day, October 31, 2007, 11:41:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

twohawks

Also, I am trying to gain a little more clarity on where the stripped off electrons go.  I would imagine they travel to and then through the anode, yes?  So the idea is they punch through the oxide layer on the anode, which repairs itself (yes?);
however, I did see a demonstration where it was said that the excess electrons were being collected and they were lighting a light bulb while producing HHO...
...can anyone comment on this and explain your thoughts and ideas on this a bit please?  (and/or direct me to where I can/should read more about it.)

Thanks,
Cheers,
TwoHawks

twohawks

Quote from: twohawks on November 16, 2007, 05:24:39 PM
Edited  Nov 16 @2:50pm pst...
@FD    (I.e., I wonder if you will end up needing a negative plate across from each anode plate so the water may be held in orientation?)

  As I think about this more, if your theory and the postulated need for magnetic alignment of the water both hold true, then  using tubes begins to make a lot more sense to me...
   ...i.e., as compared to using plates, cylindrical anodes with a rod or smaller tube in the center requires less materials because of the smaller surface area of the negative tubes/rods in the center of the anode.  Then the question would be, if your (FD's) theory is correct, then why would close spacing between the negative center tube/rod and the anode matter?  In this scenario, why would one expect a better reaction?

Does this make sense?  What do you think about this?

...oh wait a minute...  however, if you use alternating pos/neg plates, then the reaction should be taking place on both sides of the anode plate, which would make that the more efficient model (in terms of needed materials), wouldn't it?

   As an aside, I remember recently seeing someone created a model having 3 tubes instead of two per cell, i.e., one inside the other inside the other.  There were questions about just what the individual's thoughts behind that were, but I did not yet see it resolved. (cannot remember where offhand, but I am sure folks following this have run across that, and will again).

Cheers,
HTH

HeairBear

TwoHawks, The free electrons lighting a light bulb from the cell is referred to as the EEC or Electron Extraction Circuit. You can find a description in the tech breif. The EEC is connected to the anode or positive plate. During off pulse times the EEC switches on while the bulb consumes the free electrons liberated from the process. All the circuit consists of is a switch and a light bulb. Another one of Stans ingenious ideas.
When I hear of Shoedinger's Cat, I reach for my gun. - Stephen Hawking

twohawks

Thanks HeairBear!

Hey Farrah Day... would you do me the favor of tapping on the admin's shoulder (chris) over at oupower and asking him to consider validating my registration?  I have been waiting days for an authorization, or even a response to any of my emails, so I may participate over there.  Maybe his email isn't working, or my emails are being spam-trapped...  Is it possible and acceptable for you to do this for me?

Thanks,
HTH
(hth is my full name, horustwohawks, so I am not trying to be weird or anything with those initials ;^P )

twohawks

EDITED (again, #3): Conditioning and Oxide coatings...  I am a bit confused...

1) the calcium hydroxide coating that builds up on the outside of the inner cathode tube ...is not the dialectric FD is referring to...

...can somenoe explain why it would not be considered a dialectric, or would it be?  (I really need to re-study my basic electroincs...)  If #2 ahead is correct, what would be the importance of this coating calcium hydoxide on the cathode face?

2) deleted - it was an ignorant question, sorry

I am sorry if this has been answered elsewhere (maybe everyone reported it?)... please forgive my mushed brain at the moment (over-saturation).  Direction would be aprecated.

Thanks,
HTH