Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Meyer's Resonant Charging Circuit Analysed

Started by Farrah Day, November 05, 2007, 06:50:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Farrah Day

AS, I haven't seen those patents, but I'm quite familiar with the incoherent babble that goes with all of his patents. How practical in reality is it to use de-ionised water in a wfc?  Not very, as this immediately eliminates all the other everyday sources of water which would really make a water fuelled car super-practical. Not to mention the fact that the government would immediately impose heavy fuel taxes on de-ionised water.

Irrelevant of what the patents say, in the video when he is actually demonstrating his Buggy, he states its using tap water.  Now whether he means tap water that he has de-ionised, I don't know, but he doesn't say anything about processing the water first.

Here's something to make you laugh. In Meyer's Hydrogen Fracturing Process, technical brief on page 7-8 Meyers states, quote: 'The dielectric property of water (being 78.54 ohms at 25 C) permits storage of the 'electrical charge' when a potential difference exists between the electrical voltage-plates'

He also writes on page 3-16, quote: 'The established resonant frequency is most generally in the audio range from 1KHz up to and beyond 10KHz and is dependent upon the amount of CONTAMINANTS in natural water'

It's no wonder really why scientists could not take him seriously with blatant errors like this. The dielectric property of water is a constant, it is not measured in ohms. And if it was, did he not realise just how low a value 78.54 ohms is in terms of resistance. As for the water, well there you have it in black and white. It really is laughable.

Incidentally on page 7-1 he states that the VIC assembly... well here's the quote, make of it what you will:

'The "mode-of-operability" of VIC Coil Assembly allows Voltage Potential of opposite voltage polarity to increase and be attenuated up to and beyond 20 Kilovolts while inhibiting and restricting amp leakage in the milliamperes range... establishing operational parameter of utilizing "Opposite Electrical Attraction Force" of "high voltage intensity" to "instantly" releases thermal explosive energy (gtnt) from natural water.'

That is exactly as it is written, including the bad grammar. Complete and utter jibberish employing jargon designed to sound very technical and impressive to the layman.

On a more positive note, Dave Lawton really seems to be onto something with that bifilar coil that he has introduced into his cct design. The more load, the smaller the current flow?? Definitely has a ring of a possible radiant energy source being tapped. This is where we all should be focussing our attention if we want to progress.

Farrah Day
Farrah Day

"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts"

Farrah Day

Some of you might be interested in this modification to the Lawton cct.

Open attached file.

Instead of using the Buz350 and associated components on the output of the 2nd 555 timer chip, you can use this variation to power a high voltage car coil. The 'output' is pin 3 off the timer, while the 'con' is pin 5. The rest of the circuit remains the same, although that said, the car ignition coil probably won't work well with very high frequencies and so some additional component changing to reduce the pulsing frequencies might be called for.

Be careful though, 20Kv does rather make you jump!

Farrah Day
Farrah Day

"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts"

twohawks

Hi All,
I do not wish to cross-post, but I wonder if I should have posted this
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3549.msg59098.html#msg59098
in this thread instead?
Anyway, I think it may be pertinent (if there's anything to it, of course).  Any insightful responses would be most welcome.

thanks,
TwoHawks

Farrah Day

Thought some of you might be interested to know that I will shortly be doing some wfc tests which will hopefully allow a little more insight into the workings of the resonant charging cct in respect to our wfc arrangement.

I'm trying to acquire a EHT power supply that will provide up to 5KV.

I also have a function generator which I can use to accurately pulse a mosfet switch with various waveforms.

As the EHT power supply will provide extremely high voltages at very low currents, basically I will be replacing the various components of the resonant charging circuit, as known, with electronic equipment that will do the same. Now I can achieve very high voltages at various frequencies (and waveforms), using the mosfet to pulse the eht power supply across the cell.

This may or may not work as expected, but it will no doubt at least offer a little more insight into what's happening.

Will keep everyone posted.
Farrah Day

"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts"

robbryder

Hello all, I'm new to this site, and too chasing free energy. Maybe I'm crazy, but I think the idea of the resonant circuit is to resonant the "water", not the cell.. what ever the value is... (in fact if you know it, please post it)..

A capacitor is just 2 conductors separated by a dielectric. Water has resistance and  you can easily use it as the dielectric in a water capacitor. Test it, put your ohm meter leads in water.. there is resistance, and therefor put water between two steel plates and you have a capacitor.

The cell itself does not resonate, you are trying to resonate the water by pulsing the plates. From what I've seen it looks like you want to not only pulse, but ramp up the voltage as you pulse. This peaking,and drop off of the voltage will limit energy loss. At the same time, the high voltage spikes will put extra energy into the water molecues that you already have a resonance.. literally pulling them apart. 

I think the problem is that the capacitor value is constantly changing as you produce more gas. I'd think the gas/water mix would have even less resistance and change the value of the capacitor. Either way as more gas is mixed with water the capacitance is going to change.

Anyone have an idea on how to monitor the changing capacitance and then change the inductance to keep at waters resonant frequency? I think if you could, you would see alot of extra production.  (Maybe some type of motorized ferrite core). If you know the frequency of water, and can measure the capacitance, a simple controller should be able to change the inductance. The more you stay as resonance the more hydrogen you make. 

Anyway thats my story and I'm stick-en with it...

RobbRyder