Magnet Motor Recent Patent Application

[Omnibus]

Tell that to Jesse Mc. Queen Omnibus,

who has a US patent for a perpetual motion machine and is currently milking Australian investors at a record rate. Just the other day an investor got in contact with me since I was the one who exposed the scam on an old thread here. The poor guy is out of pocket 20,000 dollars and has nothing to show for it but empty promises. What makes it worse is that the poor bloke got all his mates into the scheme thinking they are all going to make millions.

It's an old story and one that many people would like to continue.

Hans von Lieven

That's why all this should be taken very seriously. Can't you do something to have this person's patent revoked if he doesn't demonstrate a working device?

[Omnibus]

This is crazy.  It is not perpetual motion but it runs on its own.  What the heck does that mean? I think the USPO should require working models, as they do for other devices, on things such as this.  If he has really done it, fine, prove it and get the patent.  If it is just another idea that "might" work, sorry...patent denied.  Just my opinion.  I have even less faith in the USPO today than I had yesterday, and I didn't think that was possible.  Open source is the only way to go, there is no doubt.

Bill

Can't agree more.

[hansvonlieven]

This was my original post:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3130.0.html

and this is the guy close to the USPTO

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3130.45.html

Fascinating, isn't it?

Hans von Lieven

[Omnibus]

G'day Bill,

According to a guy who is very close to the US patent office the trick is to use language that does not set off any warning bells in the patent office. I posted his letter to me in the Jesse Mc Queen thread in case you are interested,

From the correspondence with him I gathered that his wife is one of the examiners, though he never actually said this.

It would appear that most of the work examiners do is done with computer searches and looking for the right legal format in the applications. If certain keywords appear that are a no-no they demand proof of some sort, if not, the thing just goes through.

Hans von Lieven

@shriggedatlas was explaining something similar which shows that the patent system in the US must undergo serious changes. The way it is is a real threat to society because if these devices don't run then  nonsense is allowed to prevail officially. It goes without saying that if they run then Science must change and stop standing in the way of the search for unlimited supply of energy.

[Omnibus]

This was my original post:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3130.0.html

and this is the guy close to the USPTO

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3130.45.html

Fascinating, isn't it?

Hans von Lieven

This whole thing is a joke. Travesty of reason. No wonder why true scientists really snub at anything having to do with patents.