Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet Motor Recent Patent Application

Started by hansvonlieven, November 13, 2007, 05:51:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Pirate88179

@ All:

I just thought of another downside.  What if, one of us on here actually makes a real, verified, replicated working device.  Maybe one of us provides all the info to everyone as per the open source approach.  Then, after a while we get sued because, 10 years ago some idiot was granted a patent on this "similar" idea, which they could not make work, but now that you have made it work, lawsuit.  This is terribly wrong.  Maybe we should all write our congressmen and demand USPO reform legislation.  Not that it would do any good, but, what else can we do?

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

hansvonlieven

This is exactly what is happening Bill,

Some scam lawyers are systematically covering a lot of ground with scam patents with nothing else but this in mind. Inventors are paying up to these shysters because it is cheaper than suing them. Sad but only too true.

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

Omnibus

Quote from: Pirate88179 on November 13, 2007, 11:25:40 PM
@ All:

I just thought of another downside.  What if, one of us on here actually makes a real, verified, replicated working device.  Maybe one of us provides all the info to everyone as per the open source approach.  Then, after a while we get sued because, 10 years ago some idiot was granted a patent on this "similar" idea, which they could not make work, but now that you have made it work, lawsuit.  This is terribly wrong.  Maybe we should all write our congressmen and demand USPO reform legislation.  Not that it would do any good, but, what else can we do?

Bill
That's correct. We already discussed that possibility somewhere. Unbelievable, isn't it? This has to be fought and writing to our congressmen demanding USPTO legislation reform is a very good idea. The public should be informed of this through the media as well. I called a non-profit organization seemingly dedicated to deal with undeserved patents called Public Patent Foundation and spoke with its president. They are focusing, however, on undeserved patents granted to big corporations for things obvious. For instance, Monsanto shouldn't be allowed to patent the air we breathe and ask us to pay them for every breath we take. They (the Public Patent Foundation) didn't see too much of an economic threat in the fact that patents are issued for nonsense. He said that there are many, many such patents granted. The advice was if I'm so passionate about this to come out in the media and start alerting the public of this fact.

hansvonlieven

G'day Omnibus,

Have another look at the first post of mine about the Jesse McQueen patent. (referenced above in this thread) This is typical in a lot of applications of that ilk. It would be almost impossible to patent ANY overunity device without listing his patent as a prior since, it is nearly all encompassing. Any device launched by you or me that works can immediately be challenged with this patent alone.

This is exactly the reason I brought it up in the first place.

I have no idea how to fix this, this system seems to be very entrenched at the moment and there are a lot of vested interests one must trample on just to state one's case.

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

jeffc

Everyone,
I'm not sure if you are clear as to the status of the document Hans sent.  This patent application is only in the "published" phase, it has not been issued any patent. 

Also, this application has not been examined yet.  See attached screenshot from PAIR - Status "Docketed New Case - Ready for Examination".

So, eventually this will get examined.  It may be thrown out at that point.  There is also the possibility for the inventor to make revisions at certain points in the process.

In any case, I can 100% agree that the USPTO needs serious improvement, but lets be careful not to jump too quickly to criticize without understanding the process.

Regards,
jeffc