9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline

[mikeins]

I thought most of you want to see scientific facts before accepting something.
-there are an overwhelming amount of scientific facts proving that everything that happened that day, does not correspond to the official version.
-there is enough scientific proof from US physicists en architects that planes could not have caused the collapse.
-there are many books and DVD's that explain every aspect in detail.
-who orchestrated the 'events' on 911? certainly not a bunch of muslim terrorists!
too much carfull planning was needed weeks in advance, too much precise calculations for planting the explosives, and all TV channels kept mentioning on the very same day "secondary explosions" "third explosions" etc.

there is certainly some kind of high level conspiracy, and too many facts to mention the word 'theory'!
the only question unanswered is WHO.
if you are analysing things scientifically, you can only come to one conclusion...

one has just to be willing to do some homework.

[Cap-Z-ro]

It is pointless to languish in agonizing debate over the obvious with an ever shrinking minority who for their own personal reasons chose to ignore glaring facts.

For that reason I choose to focus on discussing the means and motives of the perpetrators.

If however, anyone wishes to speculate on the reasons why the BBC refused to account for their suspicious actions and subsequent deceptive reaction, or the elephant in the corner, represented by building 7...then I'm in.

I have found that usually those who act suspiciously and change their ground, usually have reason for do so - which has little to do with ascertainment of truth.

Regards...

[shruggedatlas]

It is pointless to languish in agonizing debate over the obvious with an ever shrinking minority who for their own personal reasons chose to ignore glaring facts.

For that reason I choose to focus on discussing the means and motives of the perpetrators.

If however, anyone wishes to speculate on the reasons why the BBC refused to account for their suspicious actions and subsequent deceptive reaction, or the elephant in the corner, represented by building 7...then I'm in.

I have found that usually those who act suspiciously and change their ground, usually have reason for do so - which has little to do with ascertainment of truth.

Regards...

But I take it you are incapable of constructing a scenario where staging 9/11 would be the optimal move?

[hansvonlieven]

But I take it you are incapable of constructing a scenario where staging 9/11 would be the optimal move?

Perhaps not so, shrugged,

If the objective was to create a scenario that allowed the state to take away from its people some of their most cherished individual freedoms it was remarkably successful and the price both in casualties and property was very low compared to what it would have cost to try to introduce those measures out of the blue.

It is still open ended and I think you will find that individual freedoms will get further curtailled as time goes by.

I am no conspiracy theorist, yet one must examine all possible angles, and this one is at least feasible.

Hans von Lieven

[fritz]

I don?t get that.
People discuss what has happened,
other people think that what has happened
can be compensated by killing the responsible
persons and bombing the middle east back to
stone age.
I have seen so far (maybe I missed here something)
nobody who is asking the question W H Y ??

Maybe it is dangerous to buy oil in the value of
some peta-billion dollars from people living in
"ancient" societies....
Maybe it is dangerous to earn the money back by
selling them weapons !!???
Maybe it is dangerous that one country expands the
size of its vital interests to the size of an entire planet !?

Free energy wont fix that.

But I think this is an interesting point to start a discussion.
Yes it was a terrible terrorist attack, lots of innocent people
died.

Otherwise thousands of people die every day - because of - !??
interests, ignorance, poverty, -----, nationalism, ...,oil, money, weapons,
drugs,-----, politics.

If you think about these issues - and how they relate to 9/11 -
it?s not necessary to solve the "what happened" issue.

You could have changed the world with the money spent in the
iraq war....
Why not changing the world ?

I don?t get that.