Nightlife's insanity, ignorance and or quest for free energy. Please Help!

[Evil Roy Slade]

@nightlife

As the chinese detective said in Get Smart:  'Amasing!'

ERS

[hansvonlieven]

@nightlife,

For crying out loud ------- Don't tell Lawrence!   

Hans

[nightlife]

hansvonlieven, why shouldn't Lawrence find out?

[hansvonlieven]

Because he would become just unbearable if he saw this and incorporated it into The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory 

Hans

[PhiScience]

Hi all,
My 3 cents

  The force of magnetism seems to have its origin in the forces of attraction or repulsion between electric currents flowing in the same, or opposite directions, respectively.
If the electric currents are along circular paths, then the magnetic effect will appear in the form of magnetic poles which are either N or S poles, depending on the side from which we view the electric currents.
It necessarily follows that there can never be a single isolated magnet pole.
All of this is clearly understood in the theoretical physics of today, but the difficulty is in explaining why there will be such attractive or repulsive forces between electric currents.
 
  A simple example of an electric current, is the flow of electrons in a copper wire.
The ether currents which keep the moving electrons connected with the protons of the copper atoms, will then become extended lengthwise of the wire, and will keep the moving electrons oriented in the same direction.
The polar flow of ether from the protons to the electrons, will then be in the direction of movement of the electrons, while the external return flow (which constitutes the true magnetic field) will be in the reverse direction, in the space around the wire.
When the wire has the form of a solenoid, the surrounding ether will therefore circulate in a direction OPPOSITE to the direction of travel of the electrons, and not in the same direction as would be expected under the nuclear theory, if the ether were considered as being merely carried along by the moving electrons.
The above conclusion as to the direction of flow of the ether in the magnetic field is a necessary consequence of the vortex structures which have been ascribed to protons and electrons respectively.
If these structures would be reversed, then the direction of flow of the ether in the magnetic field would also be reversed.
That our choice of structures has been correct seems to be corroborated, not only by the direction of the induced electromotive force in electromagnetic induction, but also by the direction of the magneto-optic effect.
  All organic substances, and nearly all inorganic substances, when placed in a magnetic field, will rotate the plane of polarization of light in a direction OPPOSITE to the direction of movement of the electrons in the solenoidal current around the magnet.
There are only a few inorganic substances (FeCl3 for example) which are exceptions, and these exceptional cases are probably due to some stroboscopic effect.

  The direction of induced electromotive force also leads to the same conclusion as to the direction of the ether in the magnet field.
When a current is started, or increased, in the primary circuit, the induced current in the secondary will flow in the OPPOSITE direction, which seems to indicate that the free electrons in the secondary are given an impulse in a direction opposite to the direction of movement of the electrons in the primary.
Such an impulse can be imparted only by a magnetic field around the primary.

  The induced current in the secondary will continue to flow only as long as the acceleration of the electrons continues.
After the current in the primary on longer increases in strength, there will no longer be any induced electromotive force in the secondary, but the free electrons in the secondary will still be held in their oriented positions by the magnetic field.
If the current in the primary then diminishes or stops flowing, the magnetic field will be removed from the secondary, and the free electrons which were held in oriented positions by such a magnetic field, will be released, whereupon they will spring back into their natural positions which will constitute a flow of current in the same direction as the current in the primary.

  Electromagnetic induction therefore leads to the same conclusions as the magneto-optic effect in regard to the direction of flow of the ether in the magnetic field.

  It will be seen from the foregoing that it is the same external flow of ether from the electrons, to the protons, which forms both the electrostatic, and the magnetic field.
In the electrostatic field, however, these external ether currents, emerge from, and terminate upon electrically charged particles, whereas in the magnetic field, they flow in closed circuits; ether along the path of an electric circuit, or around the periphery of a magnetic pole is electrically neutral.
It does not contain an accumulation of one kind of electricity, and therefore behaves toward an electric charge in the same manner as any other metal body would behave.

  Since the ether around an electric charge does not flow in closed circuits, but only from the electrons to the protons, any force which this unidirectional flow of ether may exert upon half of the magnetic pole, would be counterbalanced by an equal, and opposite force, upon the other half.

  Although an electric charge and a magnetic pole do not exert any force upon each other, they do act upon each other.
The electric charge will induce an equal and opposite charge on the adjacent surface of the magnetic pole, while the magnetic pole will induce unidirectional orientation of the electrons, relative to the protons, in the electrically charged body; just as in any other body which is positioned in a magnetic field.
If the body is transparent, then such orientation can be detected by the magneto-optic effect.

  Electric and magnetic fields differ from the gravitational field in that the flow of ether in electric and magnetic fields is always confined to limited regions.
It ether passes from negative to positive charges, around a closed circuit, whereas in a gravitational field the ether merely passes through any body that is in its path.
That is the reason why all efforts to screen or otherwise control the gravitational field have been unsuccessful.
If this could ever be accomplished, then a simple system of interplanetary travel would probably be possible.

  The problem, however, is not entirely hopeless.
The very fact that the gravitational field acts more effectively on protons, than upon electrons, seems to show that gravitational ether currents do coact in some specific manner with electrically charged particles, and when we determine the manner in which they coact, then we shall be in a better position to solve the problem of an easy method of interplanetary travel.