Nightlife's insanity, ignorance and or quest for free energy. Please Help!

[Schpankme]

@nightlife

Here's a short film, that discus's the fundamental force that forms and sustains the universe (food for thought).

THUNDERBOLTS OF THE GODS
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374&q=electric+universe&total=209&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

www.thunderboltsdvd.com

- Schpankme

[Localjoe]

Found.. and tesla happens to mention these puppies too

http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:WvYL0sDYJaUJ:cyclotron.tamu.edu/nuctheo/smp07-talks/SMP07_Fries.ppt+particles+smaller+than+electrons&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=53&gl=us&client=firefox-a
Neutrino Mass

For a long time, neutrinos were suspected to have no mass at all.

But if neutrinos do have masses, the 3 generations of neutrinos, e, , , can switch their identity while traveling through space due to a quantum effect. 

Such neutrino oscillations have been

observed in 1998.

Still neutrino masses are very small:

The mass of e is more than 100,000 times smaller than the mass of the electron.

[nightlife]

Schpankme, thanks for that video and it was very interesting and I feel it added strength to my theory.

It's nice to see that others are starting to catch on and I hope that some day my theory will be told by others with out even ever have heard of or read about what I have stated in my theory.

My words may not be the correct words to have used but the concept is the same and I have my lack of education in a theoretical sense to be able to properly explain my thoughts in words. I am trying and that?s all I can do. I do hope that people start to understand at least the concept..

I will say that this is helping me with my spelling ability and that alone is a accomplishment. LOL 

[nightlife]

Localjoe, thank you for finding that. That would explain the existence of a electron. That's is what has been bothering me about my theory because there has to be a movement and a resistance to create a electron. Then again, there has to be something to have created the element that is said to be 100,000 times smaller. Therefore, that element would have to have some sort of electron.

The whole evolution thing is never going to be possible to determine what started creation. The main thing is finding out what electricity really is so we can either produce, attract and or capturer it so we utilize it as a free power source. I believe my theory gives us the tools to do just that provided we are wise enough to utilize those tools to do so efficiently.

Are you working with the earth battery theory still? If so, how is that working out?

[PhiScience]

There are sub atomic particles you know which determine quantum entanglement.. what about those.

  It is said that any theory which purports to tell us what electricity and the elementary particles of matter really are, stand condemned at the start.
Although it is true that we cannot make something out of nothing, still we do not need to begin with a complex array of protons, electrons, and neutrons as a starting point.
These subatomic particles, and their associated fields of force, may themselves consist of self sustaining forms of motion; such as vortex motion, in a hypothetical ether having only certain general properties, such as inertia and fluidity, but no specific internal structure or molecules with atomic oscillators.