"Self Running 900 Watt Fuelless Electrical Generator" Is this new?

[esaruoho]

I said it before and now I will say it again, this guy has something.  The problem is, his team, as experienced in this field as they may be (20 + years) they don't fully understand themselves, and cannot paint a picture which can be appreciated by the majority of people viewing.  Don't send them your money, do your homework, and see the truth for yourself.

The quote I extracted from that interview was presented before this thread came into existence!!!
URGENT! WATER AS FUEL DISCOVERY FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

Read the highlights of the quote.  Referring to the red text, Trapp told you, and now you are seeing people do exactly what he said in that thread!  The bold text reveals simply that a 100 volt DC source was pulsed, in my view, this DC source served two functions:

1. charged the capacitor of the capacitive discharge circuit. 
2. was the voltage source for a high voltage step up transformer.

In the quote he says he drove a cell, however, this cell could be viewed in the same manner as we view the spark plug.  The cell therefore is easily replaced by a spark plug.

In reference to the underlined portion of the quote, the most important part of the quote.  We are informed that an RF envelope was placed over the DC.  The same thing is being done in that water fuel thread, use of the ignition coil.  The major difference between what Trapp has indicated and what is taking place on that thread is comprehension.  Experimenters and researchers in general, don't fully appreciate the function of the RF envelope as it has been labeled by Trapp.  For instance the majority on that particular thread only see the high voltage discharges as being a means for ionizing the gap space, prior to the discharging of the capacitor.  This ionization is only a small fraction of what is actually taking place!  If ionization was all that was going on, Trapp wouldn't have associated this RF window with what he termed the "Dominant" energy field.  Instead of follow the leader, attention to detail is what is really needed!  You all are very close, examine all that you have been given, only then will you be able to take action based on knowledge versus information.  You now know that Trapp's "Dominant" energy field is directly related to RF.  Time to go back to the old school books!

Regards

thank you erfinder, as always

[esaruoho]

anyone care to hazard a guess what "the flux switch transformer" is in relation to the 3 videos that have been posted by WITTS?
(from the 2005 writeup: "the gravity motor or the flux switch transformer, or the milliwatt dominant energy converter.")

ok.. whats the best page currently on the history of gravity motors? it seems to be a continuous running theme in the 2005, 2007 and 2008 interviews (jeane manning, james a. robey, stefan hartmann), that WITTS want to develop a gravity motor "buildable by a person with an IQ of 100 or higher" "that would be simple enough to be built without too many parts", etc. and to give that out on a donation-basis.

in regards the 26 or more types of electricity (none of them being "electron flow"), there does seem to be a connection to what John Bedini is saying  in Energy From The Vacuum part 2, about there being more forms of energy than the one measurable by "electron flow". has anyone spent time looking into how the descriptions of both of these people mesh together? sure, Bedini calls it  the gaseous ether, going back to what Gerry Vassilatos wrote about Tesla's Impulse DC / Impulse energy,  and Thrapp calls it dominant energy engineering, but it does seem like they are both talking about the same thing, but in different ways.

its been an interesting couple of days, starting from 26th june.  since http://www.WITTs.ws links us to a Joomla log-in page, i have great hopes that there is a website coming for WITTS. maybe even very soon?

the erfinder analysis was definitely very interesting, but still for some reason, no matter who says anything about electrolyzer methods, we're still stuck with articles like http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1769/69/, voicing general "i dont believe it, its impossible" opinions of the eco-web-communities  against water being possible to be used as a fuel.

the mentions in the james a. robey interview about a radiant energy booster, and a hydroxy mileage boosters  lead me to wonder whether the forthcoming website might have a hydroxy mileage booster for sale? any opinions, would this prove that WITTS/Thrapp is more legit, or would it do more of the opposite?

i for one would love to purchase the keely spherical heating device, seems to be a dinky piece of work. im sure it would be great to have Peter Davey  analyze the device, and to have Timothy Thrapp analyze Davey's machine. they, after all, seem to be on the same foundations of vibration+frequency+resonance. but theres no contact details to peter davey, are there? a phonenumber? anyone?

by the way, does anyone know of an affordable device that would allow one to record a mobile phone conversation, perhaps a plugin device to the cell-phone? or to record a skype conversation,maybe?

[Pirate88179]

@ esaruoho:

First, make sure you are in a "one-party" state before recording any telephone conversations.  (If you live in the US)
You can obtain a list by looking on Google.  I believe about 30 states are one party states.  This simply means that only one party has to consent to having the conversation taped, and you can be that one party.  If you have the other party's consent, then it doesn't matter.

OK.  The best way I have found to record cell phones, especially since there are so many brands and types, is to purchase a small micro cassette recorder (about $25.00) and use the speaker phone feature on the cell phone.  This will record both sides of the conversation and is reasonably clear.  I record conversations all the time using this method and it works well.  Not as good as a wire connection would be but, then you run into issues like it only records your voice and not the other end, or visa-versa.  Sometimes you get lucky and get the proper cord that does both.  If this is available, this is the best way but, I usually go with the speaker phone (hands free) setting.  I hope this helps.

Bill

[esaruoho]

thanks! i guess i can wait till october, and use this induction suction cup microphone  on an actual land-line phone, i have three of them (and they're great for recording the sounds of, for instance, adaptors, power supply units, displaycards and any other type of electrical noises that for instance laptops or even flatscreen give out. oh, and usbstick pulses (on write+read) are dinky too.  hang on, this has nothing to do with the topic anymore! ..

anyone care to guestimate how much money WITTS are looking for, to build a factory to massmanufacture devices? a mate of mine suggested they might need 3 mil, and 5mil next year due to the economy? does that sound reasonable for a "mass-manufacturing factory"?

[esaruoho]

That part in the broadcast where he said he discovered a way to grow limbs back on dogs and people, but it was being suppressed sounded like a load of crap to me.

he never said "he discovered" anything. he said that WITTS had a person working for them, who had worked under that antoine priore character, from france, and they were working at it.
i suppose this page will be as good a link on antoin priore as any:
http://www.cheniere.org/priore/index.html
seems like theres a connection to t.h.moray's devices too, at least according to what's stated on the other pages on cheniere.org which focus on priore.
http://www.rexresearch.com/priore/priore.htm
"Office of Naval Research, (London) ~ Report R-5-78 (August 16, 1978) A Biologically Active Combination of Modulated Magnetic and Microwave Fields: The Priore Machine "

anyway.. i did listen to the thrapp interview, as did you - and it really didnt seem to me that thrapp "discovered" anything regarded to priore, but they did do some research&re-development, with the help of a person who worked with priore back in the .. 60s?70s?