Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Muller Dynamo

Started by Schpankme, December 31, 2007, 10:48:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 46 Guests are viewing this topic.

conradelektro

Since there seems to be a "high level discussion" instead of "building motors" I want to ask a question about the high back electromotive force or counter electromotive force I see in my rig (see for instance http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/electricmotors.html#back or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-electromotive_force):

---------------------
Back electromotive force is a voltage that occurs in electric motors where there is relative motion between the armature of the motor and the external magnetic field.
---------------------

I built the rig as shown in the photo using coils from relays having a rather high DC resistance of 265 Ohms. (I am still in the phase of studying basic principles instead of building an exact replication of Romeos's motor).

When I drive the motor in a "pulse fashion" (e.g. with circuit as used in Romero's set up or a similar circuit) I observe a very high back-emf which is four to five times higher than the supply voltage (e.g. with a 10 Volt supply I measure up to 50 Volt back-emf over a pair of coils).

I wounder whether we should try to feed this back-emf back into the power supply (accumulator or capacitor) in order to get a self runner? No "generator coil pairs", just "drive coil pairs" the back-emf of which is "fed back"?

I recall vaguely that I saw some "invention" on YouTube that did this with a "piston like rig" where a coil was moving towards and away from a strong permanent magnet (the coil moved like the piston in a steam engine). But there are other "turning motors" where a recovery of the back-emf is claimed to "enhance their efficiency". But that would be something like a Bedini-motor?

Greetings, Conrad

gotoluc

Quote from: Magluvin on June 30, 2011, 01:28:35 AM
hey Luc

Thanks for the info.  Sounds strange though, but i accept your statement.    Is this his idea, or does it originate elsewhere? 
The strange part is how to get consistency from coil to coil.   And I would thing closer proximity would increase capacitance. But I can see that the difference is that each wind is not always beside the previous  wind along the way.  ;]

thanks again.

Ok, was just checkin in one last time.  me sleeps.

Mags

Hi Mags,

Yes this is his own idea and design based on when he first had the effect of acceleration when coil is shorted.

Luc

bolt

author=Tudi link=topic=3842.msg293388#msg293388 date=1309427536]
Images show more then 100 words.
Tried to show what a coil ringing is and how important it is to be in resonance with your RPM.
ringing_and_induction.jpg

Wrong in ZPE systems this decay becomes a gain and is exactly inverse of entropy. So this chart needs reversing.

- upper wave is your coil (+ other components) that WANT to resonate at specific frequency
- lower wave is how your SPECIFIC RPM will try to induce voltage in your coil

Resonance its not how one understands  it to be those that followed SM and the TPU he said quote "its a type of resonance but it depends on your understanding of what resonance actually is when applied in this application" What he means is TOTAL REACTIVE resonance.


If you do not match up the 2 waves then they will try to cancel out each other. If you match the 2 waves perfectly then they will add up. You could use a diode to just pinch off some part of the wave and leave some ringing in the coil also. Some say that if electron movement have some inertia then leaving some ringing might be more beneficial then extracting it all.

There is no ringing in your understanding as ringing is decay in entropy. We are dealing with longitudinal Tensor moment.

standing_wave.jpg
- This is about "bolt theory". Where you have 2 waves that should cancel each other out as sum.

Not my theory from people that know how to build ZPE devices. But its my interpretation.

Only the current is cancelled out by forcing it out of phase.

BUT as information there is a lot of things going on and they are not NULL !.

This is true when the voltage and current is shifted 90 degrees there is a static wave tensor which interfaces to the ambient.

With this technique in theory you can avoid generating Lenz

Correct as there is NO in phase current.

BUT at the output with the correct approach to separate the 2 waves and use them as you wish. I hope this image helps some people imagine a how a different out of the box approach could be made. Pls note that this is not exactly how ZPE was explained in some of the documents.

maw2432

Quote from: Tudi on June 30, 2011, 05:53:52 AM
Regarding Thane's video. Wondered since day 1 why Romero had he's wires made so "ugly", i mean i could have not done it worse if i wanted to do so. It's to be able to build up more voltage, to store energy in voltage instead magnetic field. I think this is the reason why the coils were taken away. Maybe there is a patent for such coil winding ?

LOL  - I have not seen an "ugly" coil patent.   

bolt

Quote from: gotoluc on June 30, 2011, 01:13:33 AM
Hi Mags,

Thane's coils are a single strand of well over 1000 turns each. He winds them by hand and in a random order (not making the turns tight one next to each other) which give the coil air space. This adds capacitance.

Luc

I have mentioned Thane many times.  This is a different approach to Romero. Thane HV coil has a large inductance L and  inherent capacitance C and coil resistance R. As his motor speed increases the phase becomes skewed till it reaches a point where it has become reactive and the inductance matches the capacitance of the coil versus the frequency of the pulses eventually phase is 90 degrees shifted between the volts and amps induced from the magnet. Now there is no lenz! Motor gets faster in fact you get a ZPE hysteresis  latching where he has to turn down the i/p drive power very very low to maintain a sensible speed till a point it SNAPS out of hysteresis and then effect dies. Now requires a lot of i/p motor power to get the RPM back up as phase has become locked near zero and lenz is back.  BUT very important aspect Thane uses  MOT to down convert voltage to 12v and this acts as impedance matching to keep high impedance as a load converts to low impedance lamp load alike 1000 ohm to 50 ohm RF transformer.

If you can not get Romero coils to work just wind a 2000 turn HV coil and you get the same effect.