Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

Started by Craigy, January 04, 2008, 04:11:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bruce_TPU

Quote from: Omnibus on January 30, 2008, 07:36:58 PM
Quote from: Bruce_TPU on January 30, 2008, 07:21:59 PM
Quote from: Omnibus on January 30, 2008, 04:14:36 PM
@Bruce-TPU,

Do I understand it correctly, just the HDPE part (without the magnets and the bearings) of your rotor which is 3/8" short of Jason's blue print weighs 258g, right? 

@ Omni

My current, incorrectly sized rotor, with magnets and two bearing weighs 258 grams.  I have a very accurate digital scale.

So....the correctly sized rotor will be of the incorrect weight.

@ Bill

Please PM me, if you can assist in making my rotor the correct weight at a future date.  Thanks!

Bill the tool man!   ;D

Cheers,

Bruce

EDIT:
But the question remains;  Why is the weight of our rotors off by so much, using same material, etc?  What or where is the problem?
Indeed, why is the weight of our rotors off by so much? That is one of the central questions that have to be addressed when talking to @alsetalokin.

Also, wouldn't your incorrect rotor, now being of the correct weight of 258g, be away from the stator not at exactly 5mm which @alsetalokin emphasized to be a crucial parameter (not 4mm, not 6mm, but exactly 5mm)?

We must settle this issue with the rotor weight once and for all as well as the magnetic induction profile around rotor and stators, before we can ever expect to observe the effect in the video, I think.

It seems that we're faced with fewer parameters to play with and adjust compared to other instances, say, compared to making a working Wankel engine, correct? Of all the proposed magnetic motor this one and @xpenzif's seem to be the easiest (having fewer parameters) to  optimize. That's why it seems so attractive.

Hi Omni,

The fact that the stator is so far from the rotor is how I figured out that the rotor was not cut to specs!  This is why I have had NO test results.  Not until I have the proper sized rotor.  But...It will be the wrong weight.  Why?  A.)  Wrong material  B.)  Wrong dimension  C.)  Al's scale is off  D.) He weighed without the magnets or bearing.  *This would get us closer, if that is the case.

Cheers,

Bruce
1.  Lindsay's Stack TPU Posted Picture.  All Wound CCW  Collectors three turns and HORIZONTAL, not vertical.

2.  3 Tube amps, sending three frequency's, each having two signals, one in-phase & one inverted 180 deg, opposing signals in each collector (via control wires). 

3.  Collector is Magnetic Loop Antenna, made of lamp chord wire, wound flat.  Inside loop is antenna, outside loop is for output.  First collector is tuned via tuned tank, to the fundamental.  Second collector is tuned tank to the second harmonic (component).  Third collector is tuned tank to the third harmonic (component)  Frequency is determined by taking the circumference frequency, reducing the size by .88 inches.  Divide this frequency by 1000, and you have your second harmonic.  Divide this by 2 and you have your fundamental.  Multiply that by 3 and you have your third harmonic component.  Tune the collectors to each of these.  Input the fundamental and two modulation frequencies, made to create replicas of the fundamental, second harmonic and the third.

4.  The three frequency's circulating in the collectors, both in phase and inverted, begin to create hundreds of thousands of created frequency's, via intermodulation, that subtract to the fundamental and its harmonics.  This is called "Catalyst".

5.  The three AC PURE sine signals, travel through the amplification stage, Nonlinear, producing the second harmonic and third.  (distortion)

6.  These signals then travel the control coils, are rectified by a full wave bridge, and then sent into the output outer loop as all positive pulsed DC.  This then becomes the output and "collects" the current.

P.S.  The Kicks are harmonic distortion with passive intermodulation.  Can't see it without a spectrum analyzer, normally unless trained to see it on a scope.

Omnibus

@ken_nyus,

The thickness of my rotor is slightly over 20mm (measured with a micrometer). Jason?s drawings require ?? thickness, that is 0.75 x 25.4 = 19.05mm.

The diameter of my rotor is approx. 147mm (measured with a ruler). Jason?s drawings require 2 x 2.875?, that is 5.75 x 25.4 = 146.05mm.

I wonder if these slight discrepancies would lead to the 45g difference between my 303g rotor (HDPE + magnets + two bearings) and the required 258g rotor of the original. Don?t know what the density of HDPE is.

I?m stuck with it for now (don?t know what the weight of the other rig I don?t have with me at this moment). These discrepancies do not affect the measurements of the magnetic induction profile of rotor and stator, though. I've already measured it for my N42 and have posted it here. Probably tomorrow I'll do it for my N38 and N35 magnets. Will try them also assembled to see if they'd make any difference.

Omnibus

Quote from: Bruce_TPU on January 30, 2008, 07:57:45 PM
Quote from: Omnibus on January 30, 2008, 07:36:58 PM
Quote from: Bruce_TPU on January 30, 2008, 07:21:59 PM
Quote from: Omnibus on January 30, 2008, 04:14:36 PM
@Bruce-TPU,

Do I understand it correctly, just the HDPE part (without the magnets and the bearings) of your rotor which is 3/8" short of Jason's blue print weighs 258g, right? 

@ Omni

My current, incorrectly sized rotor, with magnets and two bearing weighs 258 grams.  I have a very accurate digital scale.

So....the correctly sized rotor will be of the incorrect weight.

@ Bill

Please PM me, if you can assist in making my rotor the correct weight at a future date.  Thanks!

Bill the tool man!   ;D

Cheers,

Bruce

EDIT:
But the question remains;  Why is the weight of our rotors off by so much, using same material, etc?  What or where is the problem?
Indeed, why is the weight of our rotors off by so much? That is one of the central questions that have to be addressed when talking to @alsetalokin.

Also, wouldn't your incorrect rotor, now being of the correct weight of 258g, be away from the stator not at exactly 5mm which @alsetalokin emphasized to be a crucial parameter (not 4mm, not 6mm, but exactly 5mm)?

We must settle this issue with the rotor weight once and for all as well as the magnetic induction profile around rotor and stators, before we can ever expect to observe the effect in the video, I think.

It seems that we're faced with fewer parameters to play with and adjust compared to other instances, say, compared to making a working Wankel engine, correct? Of all the proposed magnetic motor this one and @xpenzif's seem to be the easiest (having fewer parameters) to  optimize. That's why it seems so attractive.

Hi Omni,

The fact that the stator is so far from the rotor is how I figured out that the rotor was not cut to specs!  This is why I have had NO test results.  Not until I have the proper sized rotor.  But...It will be the wrong weight.  Why?  A.)  Wrong material  B.)  Wrong dimension  C.)  Al's scale is off  D.) He weighed without the magnets or bearing.  *This would get us closer, if that is the case.

Cheers,

Bruce
We've got to clarify this problem with @alsetalokin. I'll do what I can with what I have throughout the weekend but we do need more input from the original constructor.

Omnibus

I wish more details were known about the Lego motor: http://youtube.com/watch?v=wcy0tedYBMg which is the best example so far for the application of the principle at hand, especially its self-starting, aside from the acceleration seen in the video. We have to work with what we have, however, and should only hope that the Mike story (wetting everybody's appetite followed by a sudden disappearance) from that unfortunate Bedini window motor thread won't repeat itself.

vipond50

Quote from: Omnibus on January 30, 2008, 08:14:55 PM
@ken_nyus,

The thickness of my rotor is slightly over 20mm (measured with a micrometer). Jason?s drawings require ?? thickness, that is 0.75 x 25.4 = 19.05mm.

The diameter of my rotor is approx. 147mm (measured with a ruler). Jason?s drawings require 2 x 2.875?, that is 5.75 x 25.4 = 146.05mm.

I wonder if these slight discrepancies would lead to the 45g difference between my 303g rotor (HDPE + magnets + two bearings) and the required 258g rotor of the original. Don?t know what the density of HDPE is.

I?m stuck with it for now (don?t know what the weight of the other rig I don?t have with me at this moment). These discrepancies do not affect the measurements of the magnetic induction profile of rotor and stator, though. I've already measured it for my N42 and have posted it here. Probably tomorrow I'll do it for my N38 and N35 magnets. Will try them also assembled to see if they'd make any difference.

Hello
One thing that would be nice to know is what spec of HDPE was your rotors made out of ?

More than likely it is ASTM D4976, but if one wanted to know for sure call the shops and ask for the ASTM spec. and or have them track it down.
There are several possiblities