9/11: Anomalies at the WTC & the Hutchison Effect (New Paper by Wood/Hutchison)

[CB_Brooklyn]

Mebe mebbe not.
Those planes you see are real, its just they are not the real planes.
The ability to remote a Boeing 747 was invented in Melbourne Australia back in 1978 by students of RMIT university, it was trailed and tested in Nevada. Case and point,. remote control of a Boeing jet liner and even automated landing systems are nearly 30 year old production standards before 9/11.

Second point, thermate was used to gently rock the towers into collapse as a sudden explosion would be obvious. You can see it in the videos of the day. The Battery banks that served standalone reserve power to the 81'st and 89'th? floors were replaced 3 days before 911 and never connected These were the primer for the softening core outer section that produced the initial collapse. From then the floors were blown every third floor. The basement was blown to conceal the 400 billion on gold that had been ferried away the 3 to 4 days before the attack, then again to drop the central core just a couple of inches to "crack" the joins using the buildings own rigidity. (Snap!!)

The last explosions were 5 floors above the deck to drop the central core columns into the pit created when the first explosion, before the collapse destroyed the 4 floors underground.

Now I don't know who you are but the ideas that there were no planes came from CIA plants to make the people who did know the truth look stupid and foolish. Are you trying to disprove a scientifically proven theory that can, in a court of law, become fact if it were ever to be given a chance? People that have a lifetime invested in Physics can show you over and over exactly what happened on that day. No super glue guns were used....

Thermite cannot explain the destruction seen at the WTC and therefore is a red herring. The towers did not "collapse", they were pulverized.





The WTC was destroyed with Directed Energy Weapons.

The planes were not real, they were a projection. It has already been proven that the videos are fake, in that they violate high school-level physics. (Aluminum airplanes with plastic nosecones don't glide through steel girders and concrete slabs.) Most of the First Responders' testimony were not consistent with a wide-body commercial jet flying 400MPH at 800 ft altitude.

Even Peter Jennings knew the 9/11 airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC plays the clip back in slow motion:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCDu2V3yjS4

[CB_Brooklyn]

dupe post

[shruggedatlas]

Idiocy.

[utilitarian]

The WTC was destroyed with Directed Energy Weapons.

The planes were not real, they were a projection. It has already been proven that the videos are fake, in that they violate high school-level physics. (Aluminum airplanes with plastic nosecones don't glide through steel girders and concrete slabs.) Most of the First Responders' testimony were not consistent with a wide-body commercial jet flying 400MPH at 800 ft altitude.

I am sorry, but you are a moron.  Yes, the planes were not real.  No one is arguing this, so quit repeating it.  What you do not understand is that there were no real towers, so the explosion was a projection as well.  Why do you need DEW to destroy a hologram of a building?  That makes no sense.   Please learn to use your brain and do some independent thinking, instead of just swallowing what the news media feeds you.  There were no towers.  Get a clue.

[Red]

Yes dumb. I am silly, New York is an illusion, you can tell when the ABC anchor stutters when directing the weather man who is actually a robot and the weather is itself controlled by a Chinese company.