DEBATE THREAD

[Bessler007]

I see I've made my point.  There should come a time in everyone's life when they face very hard decisions.  I don't deny those decisions exist.  It's next to impossible to make the right choice if you're gazing back to Egypt.  If you expect to make the right choice you need to focus on what should be rather than what was.

They say you shouldn't bet the farm.  Hell, I'll burn the mother down if I think it's the right thing to do.


Bessler007

edit:  anyone that would like to claim more than the inventor of the SIMPLE MAGNET OVER UNITY TOY is attempting to debunk the originator's claim.  The burden of proof is on them.

[psychopath]

@Bessler,

I see that you are ignoring my earlier replies to your posts, you also don't seem to know what "over unity" means.

You are mistaken, the burden of proof is on you, because if you look carefully I haven't claimed anything. However, you have made countless claims, such as the impossibility of violation of CoE, and your holy "facts".

Look carefully, I have neither said that the smot is definitely provides free energy, nor did I say a looped smot was possible. The only point that I've made is that you cannot say a violation of CoE is impossible without proof. Of course I'm not saying that just because you have no proof that a smot is a free energy machine, I'm saying that such claims require proof.

So the burden of proof is not on me, it is on you

[PolyMatrix]

Talking of 'Any' physicist and proof we only need to look at the example of the announcement of 'Cold Fusion' reference: http://peswiki.com/energy/PowerPedia:Cold_fusion and what happened historically there.

[psychopath]

Talking of 'Any' physicist and proof we only need to look at the example of the announcement of 'Cold Fusion' reference: http://peswiki.com/energy/PowerPedia: Cold_fusion and what happened historically there.

Great find  . That article is a perfect example of what I meant.

[Bessler007]

Hello Poly,

I don't mind addressing your comment.  Here is something you should realize.  The geeks that examine the world have quite a bit of fiscal clout.  In addition to that individual clout, they network with an incredible power.  Also, if you assess your personal ability to investigate, you have to admit it's no where near the ability of someone with a job at the jet propulsion lab or Cal Tech or MIT or any other research facility around the world.

Now I know for a fact people at those facilities bleed just like you do.  A very big difference is they have access to resources you most likely don't; not the lest of these being personal capital.  Now if there were anything to cold fusion don't you suppose these geeks would have capitalized on it?

Since I know some of those geeks I'd suggest they would.

Bessler007


[/quote]

Talking of 'Any' physicist and proof we only need to look at the example of the announcement of 'Cold Fusion' reference: http://peswiki.com/energy/PowerPedia: Cold_fusion and what happened historically there.