The Tesla Project

[wattsup]

@AC

Yes I agree with what you have said. It is so crazy that you guys are talking about this now and I have been mulling over this for the last few days (while the forum was down). I will put another post on a pretty radical idea about electricity, but not in this post.

I will also try the circuit you have shown. Question is where would you connect the coil of the output relay.

But first I would like to show something that is pretty neat and a very simple method of producing high voltage from a low voltage source and that may help answer your questions.

My pulsing device is just a reed switch and a magnet in a circuit with a microwave transformer. The source battery has 12.2 volts and in just a few seconds I get 870 volts inside my tank capacitor.

Lots of photos. The first photo shows the complete system. The second photo shows a close up of my magnet near the reed switch and the sparks. The third photo shows the scope shot taken when the reed sparks. The fourth is a basic diagram.

The scope shot is much more involved then shown. Actually the whole scope screen is full of vertical lines. The scope was set as follows

VARIABLE VOLT/DIV 5 (my scope maximum)
TIME DIV 5ms
PROBE WAS SET AT 10X (because at 1x the waves just shot way off the screen).

I am doing a few other reed tests with a microwave transformer but with the top removed so I have a great electromagnet with a secondary. I tried this with the above circuit and it produces about half the voltage rise as the one above in the same time frame, but it permits to use the electromagnet for other things such as motive force, relay latching, etc., that you cannot do with the closed armature of a normal transformer. I will use two cut microwave transformers and try my circuit entitled 3 Way Reed Flyback Tester that I put up on page 8 of this thread.

I will also try my FTPU build and a few other builds with this driven method and see what gives.

Lastly, I am now very convinced that any form of coil to coil coupling should be done via laminated metallic plates. I you have to cut up a regular transformer and retrieve the laminates, this will give you the best coupling possible and you can then apply many types of coiling configurations. Using solid iron rod or bunched iron wire is not good and a major waste of time. If you have a microwave transformer, just grind off one of the welds that holds the top (or bottom) and then break it off with a hammer. Takes 5 minutes. This will give you both a very powerful electromagnet plus secondary to recycle energy plus some great laminate material to wind test coils. I put up the two last photos to show how to cut the transformer.

I'll fill you guys in when I have more concrete results. lol

@nul-points

Good work there. I will have to look at this more closely when time permits.

[giantkiller]

Think what you want.   

To know, one must shut down the sense faculty.  If and when you succeed, you will begin to comprehend nature, and no longer need to interpret, as she is fully capable and willing to tell you how she does what she does.  The question we should be asking at this point is, if the senses are shut down, with what faculty is one interacting with Nature?  LOL...

Walter Russell quoted....

--giantkiller.

[Grumpy]

how do these real-life results sit with your ideas above?

Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc

Nice work.

I'm trying to get my mind around the essentials of it all, so that I can devise a better way than charging batteries.  We need something on the order of 20kw for home or auto use - this isn't small potatoes.

Lookng over Ivor Catt's work with Heaviside's "energy current" - interesting ideas presented.  He also brings up that a DC current is the resutls of two opposing traveling waves - 

[nul-points]

thanks guys, hoped it would be relevant


Ivor Catt - yes, and not just DC in circuit wires - he suggests the charge on a cap is reflecting waves, too!

all the best
sandy
Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc

[amigo]

@Amigo
My children have similar thoughts, all they know is that they want and when they get what they want then they want more. Personally I do not subscribe to that kind of nonsense, there is no satisfaction in a job well done, no insight nor understanding, no problem solving ability is developed and it does not build character nor independance, sometimes you have to get your hands dirty to succeed.

See, that's where we respectfully disagree. These are just steps on the path and there's absolutely no reason that we all have to go through them from the very beginning. Someone had already laid down the stones before us, and our job is to continue laying stones ahead. And that would work just fine if there weren't people of older generations (no disrespect to yourself) who believe that younger generations need to learn the lesson the "hard way", the way older generations did it because that's how *they* believe character is built.

I'm sorry but that's just totally backwards way of thinking and by the same analogy there are still people out there (not saying you) who still believe woman's place is in the house as a homemaker, or to raise the children, and not be an equal partner among men.

What I'm trying to say is this: The knowledge of the past experiences *is* available, but older generations do not share it outright because they want to teach the younger generations "a lesson" (or they do not wish to be surpassed by younger generations, but that is just plain ludicrous thinking).
Instead of letting the younger generations soar high freely with the knowledge the older generations could impart, they are making the younger generations crawl on the ground while at the same time enchanting them with stories of flight they might achieve one day *if* they follow in the same footsteps of the older generations.

That is a recipe for producing factory belt conventional thinkers which our academia has been seeding for decades now, endorsed by the governments, of course, because they don't want radical thinkers who think outside the box and could stir the pot by showing everyone how obsolete the governments and academia really are.

The ways of the old are not necessarily the ways of the new, nor should they be. And neither are good or bad ways. But minds are evolving and are faster to catch things than those before them. Why should anyone stand in the path of development because of their ego?