Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia.

Started by RunningBare, February 04, 2008, 09:02:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 51 Guests are viewing this topic.

OilBarren

Quote from: LarryC on April 18, 2008, 06:40:24 PM
Quote from: OilBarren on April 18, 2008, 12:34:32 PM

SORRY WE NEVER GOT OUR INDUCTION MOTOR ABOVE RATED MAX SPEED - LUC TRIED AND BLEW UP HIS HOUSE.


Sorry, I got confused by your listing of ignorant statement - factual statement in response #1011 to PB. Didn't know if that was ignorant statement or factual statement, after all with enough added power it could be a fact. Should have understood with THE BEST ONE part of the statement.

THE BEST ONE:
OR THAT A MOTOR THAT IS OPERATING AT ITS MAXIMUM SPEED AS DICTATED BY THE
LINE FREQUENCY - WILL SOMEHOW ACCELERATE BEYOND THIS MAXIMUM SPEED SO THAT
THE SLIP ANGLE BETWEEN THE ROTOR AND STATOR IS NOW LESS THAN ZERO?

Regards,
Larry

HEY LARRY,

CAN YOU DO ME A FAVOUR?
CAN YOU CORRECT MY SPELLING MISTAKES WHEN QUOTING CONFUSING IGNORANT/FACTUAL STATEMENTS WHICH COULD POTENTIALLY BE FACT? RE:OPERATING

THANKS MAN
Thane

LarryC

Quote from: OilBarren on April 18, 2008, 07:54:09 PM
Quote from: LarryC on April 18, 2008, 06:40:24 PM
Quote from: OilBarren on April 18, 2008, 12:34:32 PM

SORRY WE NEVER GOT OUR INDUCTION MOTOR ABOVE RATED MAX SPEED - LUC TRIED AND BLEW UP HIS HOUSE.


Sorry, I got confused by your listing of ignorant statement - factual statement in response #1011 to PB. Didn't know if that was ignorant statement or factual statement, after all with enough added power it could be a fact. Should have understood with THE BEST ONE part of the statement.

THE BEST ONE:
OR THAT A MOTOR THAT IS OPERATING AT ITS MAXIMUM SPEED AS DICTATED BY THE
LINE FREQUENCY - WILL SOMEHOW ACCELERATE BEYOND THIS MAXIMUM SPEED SO THAT
THE SLIP ANGLE BETWEEN THE ROTOR AND STATOR IS NOW LESS THAN ZERO?

Regards,
Larry

HEY LARRY,

CAN YOU DO ME A FAVOUR?
CAN YOU CORRECT MY SPELLING MISTAKES WHEN QUOTING CONFUSING IGNORANT/FACTUAL STATEMENTS WHICH COULD POTENTIALLY BE FACT? RE:OPERATING

THANKS MAN
Thane

More confusion caused on my part. In #1011 you seem to be pointing out false statements (due to ignorance on their part) made by the nay sayers and then pointing out the actual observed facts. 

Example:
OR THAT EVEN THOUGH THE STARTING CAPACITOR CAN BE PHYSICALLY REMOVED AND THE EFFECT STILL REMAINS - IT STILL IS THE CAPACITOR THAT CAUSES THE EFFECTS?

False statement: THE CAPACITOR CAUSE THE EFFECT.

Factual statement:  THE STARTING CAPACITOR CAN BE PHYSICALLY REMOVED AND THE EFFECT STILL REMAINS.


I only meant that when you said THE BEST ONE (of the false statements), I should have realized that you were pointing out the false statement of trying to operate an induction motor above its maximum rpm as dictated by its line frequency. The fact being that you can't have a slip angle less than zero in a normal induction motor. I was confused because if there was enough power back from the rotor it would be possible.

Regards,
Larry


OilBarren

Quote from: LarryC on April 18, 2008, 09:55:16 PM
More confusion caused on my part. In #1011 you seem to be pointing out false statements (due to ignorance on their part) made by the nay sayers and then pointing out the actual observed facts. 

Example:
OR THAT EVEN THOUGH THE STARTING CAPACITOR CAN BE PHYSICALLY REMOVED AND THE EFFECT STILL REMAINS - IT STILL IS THE CAPACITOR THAT CAUSES THE EFFECTS?

False statement: THE CAPACITOR CAUSE THE EFFECT.

Factual statement:  THE STARTING CAPACITOR CAN BE PHYSICALLY REMOVED AND THE EFFECT STILL REMAINS.


I only meant that when you said THE BEST ONE (of the false statements), I should have realized that you were pointing out the false statement of trying to operate an induction motor above its maximum rpm as dictated by its line frequency. The fact being that you can't have a slip angle less than zero in a normal induction motor. I was confused because if there was enough power back from the rotor it would be possible.

Regards,
Larry

FINE, FINE WHATEVER - HOW'S MY SPELLING???

Thane

hoptoad

Quote from: OilBarren on April 18, 2008, 11:40:57 AM
ABOVE THE CRITICAL SPEED THRESHOLD THIS SCENARIO WILL ALSO ACCELERATE.

QuoteHave you actually tried this with a DC motor and observed an acceleration effect on S/C? What sort of DC motor?  I have not observed it, but then, I used very low impedance commutator switched, shunt wound DC permanent magnet motors for driving and loading comparisons. I'm not surprised that I never observed the acceleration effect with these motors. And conventional theory says I shouldn't have been surprised. I haven't heard or read of anyone else (yet) that has observed this effect in a closed systemI'm all ears now ! You might be a miracle worker after all !  :D :D.

MY FEELING IS THAT IF THE ADDITIONAL TORQUE SUPPLIED BY THE HIGH VOLTAGE COILS AND THE HIGH CURRENT COILS IN SERIES IS GREATER THAN THE TORQUE REQUIRED TO TURN THE DC MOTOR THE SYSTEM SHOULD ACCELERATE.

@Thane, I wasn't referring to the acceleration effect of the open system alternator (generator) driven by a DC motor. I was referring to the effect (or lack thereof) when using a DC motor in generator mode, regardless of what type of motor is driving it.

I achieved the acceleration effect readily using DC pm motors driving my open system alternator, but never once did I witness the effect when using the same DC motors to drive another DC motor in generator mode. This is in agreement with your previous posted statement,

"6) DC MOTOR IN GENERATOR MODE + ( # 5 ) ABOVE = MAX REGENERATIVE BRAKING"

I am really very curious to know; have you actually witnessed, through experimentation, any acceleration effect during current loading, when using a DC motor as a generator, regardless of driving motor type? If you haven't, do you know of anyone who has?
Cheers and KneeDeep  :)

OilBarren

Quote from: hoptoad on April 18, 2008, 11:03:33 PM
I achieved the acceleration effect readily using DC pm motors driving my open system alternator, but never once did I witness the effect when using the same DC motors to drive another DC motor in generator mode. This is in agreement with your previous posted statement,

"6) DC MOTOR IN GENERATOR MODE + ( # 5 ) ABOVE = MAX REGENERATIVE BRAKING"

I am really very curious to know; have you actually witnessed, through experimentation, any acceleration effect during current loading, when using a DC motor as a generator, regardless of driving motor type? If you haven't, do you know of anyone who has?

Cheers and KneeDeep  :)

# 6 SAYS BRAKING TO ME?

WE ARE USING A DC MOTOR AS A PRIME MOVER AND THEORETICALLY IF THE TORQUE SUPPLIED BY THE LOADED COILS IS GREATER THAN THAT SUPPLIED BY THE MOTOR, THE MOTOR WILL ACCELERATE BEYOND THE SPEED DICTATED BY THE INPUT POWER AND START ACTING LIKE A GENERATOR - GENERATING POWER.

LUC IS TOYING WITH THE IDEA OF ELIMINATING THE MOTOR ALTOGETHER AND SHORTING COILS TO CREATE A SELF RUNNING SYSTEM - BECAUSE THE MOTOR SEEMS TO ONLY BE REQUIRED TO GET THINGS STARTED.

Thane