Thane Heins Perepiteia.

[JustMe]

Thane sent this late yesterday and asked me to to post it. It's the high speed test results he's already shared in pdf format.

[JustMe]

Years ago, I received ridicule and open hostility from EE peers when I demonstrated this effect and its usefulness in generation. Thats two of a few reasons why I don't use my real name on this site. Alas, in the attitudes and minds of many, nothing changes until change comes knocking at the door.

I'm reading a book right now written by British astrophysicist Michael Hawkins called 'Hunting Down the Universe'.  In part it examines his view of how vulnerable the presumably dispassionate and objective science of cosmology is to various human frailties.  He notes, among many other things, that observational evidence is often ignored or dismissed unless there is an existing theory that explains it. Sadly, it's a part of human nature that I suspect has likely crippled many endeavours.

[allcanadian]

@Hoptoad

[RCH]

Nul-points,

Absolutely.

Herald Aspden's discovery of the "Aspden Effect" was real and repeatable ... and VERY puzzling to all those who still think a motor is just a "prime mover," and a gyroscope is just a "toy."   

Here's his remarkable discovery, in his own words--

http://www.energyscience.org.uk/le/Le30/le30.html

And, yes, his research into rotating systems -- coupled with that of DePalma and Laithwaite (and Heins?) -- further confirms that "space" is NOT "just an empty vacuum"....

As you said, it will be interesting to see if these same effects reveal themselves in Thane's current machines -- when he begins looking for them -- or, in those of the others on this forum who have managed to partially replicate his results so far ....

Amazing thing, real research.         


RCH

[aether22]

Private Email
Hi! Where are you?! The forum misses you, and there's another big ZPE supporter there who is lonely and worried about you. lol Are you still reading the forum? His name is Richard C. Hoagland and he's associated with some big time alternative radio show called Coast to Coast.

Anyway, we really do miss you.  I hope things are good, and that you'll pop by soon.

Things are good, after getting behind in reading posts and frustrated by all the talking I found less interest in talking, sorry about that. (Some just seemed quite off topic)
Also a major part is that I had Thanes kindly sent rotor with lots of extras but nothing to report yet to many waiting to hear of my results I'm sure, I had some real trouble getting the right wire and that and 'living life' took the first few weeks after getting back, then I had just started to work on building the coil with my newly acquired wire when I had a headache that lasted the best part of a week leaving me with the feeling it would come back if I did anything much the next day and then it was the weekend which isn't a great time to get anything done for me.

But yesterday and today I am winding, it's not fast despite using a drill, already had one break.

So enough as to why I have nothing to show yet, happy to 'flake out' anyway, that way RCH's fears are less likely to come true, why assassinate a flake?

It is odd having you introduce me to Hoagland, you are probably one of the few here that had not heard of him, he is an interesting guy, he loves to present stuff that is simply almost impossible to believe but often gives a tantalizing level of evidence.

Possibly the best thing I have seen him present is evidence that the moon landing was not a hoax, not that it's a hard one to disprove, it is the weakest 'conspiracy theory' I have ever heard but he did an excellent job, only to later 'prove' that C-3PO is lying dead in a crater on the moon

But on to more serious things.

First LarryC, do I understand that you had success when you used a grinder motor?

But what has be most bewildered is what is going on with Thane.

I am not crystal clear on the experiments he has preformed since I went on my holiday, in part because I don't think they have been presented all that clearly.
But I understand somehow he has discounted the idea that anything from the generator is effecting the motor and that it is simply the generator effecting the generator.

I am not sure then how he explains his original discovery, but I am not going to be sent off course, that is what I am chasing.

So Thane if you could be so good as to try and answer these 2 questions:

1: If you do not believe the results of the initial demo anymore then can you explain those results? If so please explain.

2: What experiment did you do which you felt has disproven that initial experiment? (If it is one using a long length of PVC, can you please go into a decent level of detail, did it work with only one stator or were more needed? etc...)


Finally I must say that I agree with Hoagland, DePalma did very interesting experiments and I got to hear of many of them from the horses mouth, I stayed at his place for a few days and kept in touch until his passing.