Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia.

Started by RunningBare, February 04, 2008, 09:02:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

LarryC

@hoptoad

There's been a lot of theoretical posturing going on here in last few pages. Now for something completely different!

You're right, especially when results slow down. We're well know as Thane's Insane Group and proud of it. Oops more posturing!


My setup didn't perform as well as the rest and no oscilloscope, so I'll leave the testing to them.


Rectify to DC and filter the HV coil O/P. (either directly or on the stepped down side of a transformer load if you're using one.)

One observation: After my motor accelerated about 200 rpms, I connected a large 3 amp 120V to 12V transformer and it slowed back down to starting point??? Unusual, because my setup had the odd feature of not slowing down after removing the short.

Regards,
Larry



JustMe

Quote from: OUman on May 09, 2008, 09:59:17 AM
Well, the difference is the "wishy-washy" part.

Aspects of Quantum Mechanics are pretty wishy-washy.  Current knowledge predicts that we will never, ever be able to determine both the position and velocity of a quantum particle at the same time. If you want to quantify one, you're gonna have to be wishy-washy on the other. Should maybe toss the whole damn wishy-washy thing.

OUman

Quote from: JustMe on May 09, 2008, 10:15:44 AM
Quote from: OUman on May 09, 2008, 09:59:17 AM
Well, the difference is the "wishy-washy" part.

Aspects of Quantum Mechanics are pretty wishy-washy.  Current knowledge predicts that we will never, ever be able to determine both the position and velocity of a quantum particle at the same time...

That's not wishy-washy. The probability tradeoff in position and time is determined by the wave function and that concept is used routinely to design and build actual microelectronic devices.

JustMe

Quote from: OUman on May 09, 2008, 10:34:29 AM
That's not wishy-washy. The probability tradeoff in position and time is determined by the wave function and that concept is used routinely to design and build actual microelectronic devices.

You gotta love applied wishy-washiness!

Oh, and ambitious, well intentioned and determined research too.

OUman

Quote from: JustMe on May 09, 2008, 10:59:02 AM
Quote from: OUman on May 09, 2008, 10:34:29 AM
That's not wishy-washy. The probability tradeoff in position and time is determined by the wave function and that concept is used routinely to design and build actual microelectronic devices.

You gotta love applied wishy-washiness!
Oh, and ambitious, well intentioned and determined research too.

Thank-you  :)