Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU?

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi Omnibus
First post this so call proof of the SMOT then show me where the SMOT was your idea because I don't beleave it was I know you don't have a creative bone in your body and are the type of person that needs to jump on the cot tails of real inventers.
One question how much do you get payed to babble on about his invention called the SMOT?
Take Care Omnibus
Graham

[Rusty_Springs]

oops I left the a out of coat me bad oh and my ideas are shit so I would like everyone to stop experimenting with any idea I posted, tell me how I can stop them wasting there time Omnibus do I have some kind of copy right on them or something
Take Care All
Graham

[sm0ky2]

Hi Omnibus
First post this so call proof of the SMOT then show me where the SMOT was your idea because I don't beleave it was I know you don't have a creative bone in your body and are the type of person that needs to jump on the cot tails of real inventers.
One question how much do you get payed to babble on about his invention called the SMOT?
Take Care Omnibus
Graham

@ Graham

i offered to give an independent peer review of his SMOT theory, but unfortunately Omnibus was unable to produce the so-called "work" he claims to have done in this area.  My personal experience with various SMOT designs was quite the contrary of CoE. i would love to see one that actually did what he claims it does.





@ CLANZER --- I hope you can Read this through the Garbage...

                   I found a way around the problem with working with 2 circumferances (rotary Tri-Force)

          connect 2 gates onto the same Back-Bar  so it makes like a double-triangle. Then fold them out at right angles

          ( L-shaped)   and place them either on the inner circumferance, or the outer.
This gives us the power of both sides of the gate on ONE side of the circle. and i think will help eliminate some of the "geometrical issues".

[Omnibus]

SMOT is not the issue here. The issue here is that there's no such thing as "tri-force" motor and anyone claiming such a thing should be promptly cut short. This isn't a sanatorium for a friendly bliss This is a very serious matter which should be handled with responsibility, not by fantasies of maniacs.

At this point the so-called "tri-force" is another miserable failure as a way to produce pmm. This is seen clearly in CLaNZeR's and @klicUK's experiments. All we see there are the expected trivial impossibility to create an all magnet pmm.

Next idea which seems interesting is the octagonal one but so far it isn't clear whether or not anyone has made a self-starter with it. If so, it would be remarkable. I'm not holding to my hat, though, until a a reproducible structure can be built.

Thus, it's too early for any celebration. The truth is that regarding pmm we are at the same position we were a year or two ago. Not one inch of progress. Sad but true.

[HopeForHumanity]

SMOT is not the issue here. The issue here is that there's no such thing as "tri-force" motor and anyone claiming such a thing should be promptly cut short. This isn't a sanatorium for a friendly bliss This is a very serious matter which should be handled with responsibility, not by fantasies of maniacs.

This is one of the official definitions of maniac; I find it a rude word to use:

"a person who has an obsession with or excessive enthusiasm for something"

LMAO!