Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU?

Started by couldbe, February 20, 2008, 08:45:25 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

With this concept using the triangular station is impossible to defend even an analysis of the type I'm presenting of the SMOT and of the magnetic propagator exactly because of the repulsion barrier at the entrance which is lacking in Jonannes Taisnierius' device (SMOT).

del_toro_es

The repelling bump is the same in the first gate than in the second gate. If you put the roller at a start  in a position than avoid the repelling bump of the first gate you do not need spent this energy in the first gate, but you need spend this energy to pass the repelling bump of the second gate. This is the reason because if you drop a pendulum with and angle, the pendulum achieve the same angle at the opposite side, because gravitation is conservative field.

Omnibus

Quote from: del_toro_es on February 28, 2008, 11:09:19 AM
The repelling bump is the same in the first gate than in the second gate. If you put the roller at a start  in a position than avoid the repelling bump of the first gate you do not need spent this energy in the first gate, but you need spend this energy to pass the repelling bump of the second gate. This is the reason because if you drop a pendulum with and angle, the pendulum achieve the same angle at the opposite side, because gravitation is conservative field.

However, putting "the roller at a start  in a position than avoid the repelling bump of the first gate" does require spending of energy which you like to ignore.

Rusty_Springs

Hi All
First I want to say Im interested in how your setup goes sm0ky2, I have uploaded a experiment doing the same with the Trigate as the SMOT that is having it go slightly uphill falling of the edge and going through the second gate you can find that at the file section of Erics Minato Group the name of the file is TriGateDoingSmot.wmv.
I'm interested in knowing does it take more energy to pick something up and move it into the extentions of the gate to start it or move it to the extentions infront of the gate to start it or how much extra energy does it take to place it 30cm infront of the gate instead of in the extentions of the gate.
Take Care all
Graham

FreeEnergy

why not have some ramps with the tri-force magnets that over lap each other. have ramps over lap to bypass the opposing entrance of the gate.