Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU?

[Omnibus]

hmmm lets see here... http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=profile;u=10095;sa=showPosts

So, did you pay attention to this written on  page 18 " Mechanical setups / Magnet Motors / Re: Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU? "      on: March 16, 2008, 06:59:40 PM


"...  From Wiki:  "However, perpetual motion usually refers to a device or system that delivers more energy than was put into it."

or you just like to post links without reading them?

[FreeEnergy]

ok get back to me when you have a video/picture showing exactly how to build a self running looped smot, till then i am moving on.


peace

[Omnibus]

ok get back to me when you have a video/picture showing exactly how to build a self running looped smot, till then i am moving on.


peace

Why should I? The fact that you don't understand certain things isn't something to be proud of and to demand from other people things. I'd be very ashamed if I were you and will keep real quiet.

[HopeForHumanity]

so far i haven't seen a video of a self running looped smot. unless i missed it? did anybody here see it? did i miss the boat again?

You missed nothing. He has admitted that the energy created by his smot is useless, thus it isn't loopable and cannot be considered violation of CoE in a two way manner (connecting the energy channel).

Where have admitted this? Just the contrary, I've always said that the excess energy produced by SMOT can be used for practical purposes, given the proper engineering research and development is done, and that is probably a more straightforward way to go for those technically oriented who want to see it applied in industry and home. Just as I've always said that Paul Sprain's direct approach is probably the most practical of all for continuous production of excess energy. 

I would actualy believe what you say if you continued your smot construction beyond your useless toy. You have a lot of promise in that post; prove it by actualy working on it. Thats what people do when they have a project worth working on. Either I have missed your rare moment, or you have not posted any "practical purposes" for the excess energy.

[Omnibus]

so far i haven't seen a video of a self running looped smot. unless i missed it? did anybody here see it? did i miss the boat again?

You missed nothing. He has admitted that the energy created by his smot is useless, thus it isn't loopable and cannot be considered violation of CoE in a two way manner (connecting the energy channel).

Where have admitted this? Just the contrary, I've always said that the excess energy produced by SMOT can be used for practical purposes, given the proper engineering research and development is done, and that is probably a more straightforward way to go for those technically oriented who want to see it applied in industry and home. Just as I've always said that Paul Sprain's direct approach is probably the most practical of all for continuous production of excess energy. 

I would actualy believe what you say if you continued your smot construction beyond your useless toy. You have a lot of promise in that post; prove it by actualy working on it. Thats what people do when they have a project worth working on. Either I have missed your rare moment, or you have not posted any "practical purposes" for the excess energy.

See, the thing is, I'm not at all interested in the practical application of the scientific discoveries. As a matter of fact, I'm following what's happening with the search for self-sustaining devices only because of the psychological effect they'll have for accepting the violation of CoE by the society. As you know, I have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that CoE can be violated. Unfortunately, and that's only for psychological reasons, that will not be accepted by the society at large unless it is clothed in an engineering solution of a self-sustaining device. That's a sad situation, that's not necessary for the acceptance of a scientific phenomenon, but this is how the world functions. nowadays.