Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU?

gwhy! · March 29, 2008, 07:15:40 AM

With all due respect omnibus please shut up. I think 99% of people who read these forums know what the final goal is ( something that self runs ). I only have a very limited or maybe no understanding of physics ( its not my field ) but I do understand that to make such a 'device' it would be about fooling the natural balance of said 'device'. These forums are all about exchanging ideas and NOT about trying to ENFORCE your knowledge, views and theories onto other people its irrelevant who's right or wrong ( for me anyway ), say you piece, read the replies and then move on.... its that simple. And Omnibus Please do not post a reply quoting me on any of this. Just a very small reply if you feel you must write more crap but please don't start telling me how wrong or how stupid I am because it will be water of a ducks back, just in case you don't understand what I just said I don't give a flying f**k.

Omnibus · March 29, 2008, 07:30:38 AM

Quote from: gwhy! on March 29, 2008, 07:15:40 AM
With all due respect omnibus please shut up. I think 99% of people who read these forums know what the final goal is ( something that self runs ). I only have a very limited or maybe no understanding of physics ( its not my field ) but I do understand that to make such a 'device' it would be about fooling the natural balance of said 'device'. These forums are all about exchanging ideas and NOT about trying to ENFORCE your knowledge, views and theories onto other people its irrelevant who's right or wrong ( for me anyway ), say you piece, read the replies and then move on.... its that simple. And Omnibus Please do not post a reply quoting me on any of this. Just a very small reply if you feel you must write more crap but please don't start telling me how wrong or how stupid I am because it will be water of a ducks back, just in case you don't understand what I just said I don't give a flying f**k.

On the contrary, I will reply and I will tell you that I will continue the necessary discussion and will not agree that people such as you who by their own admission "only have a very limited or maybe no understanding of physics" to govern what is and what is not to be discussed. This absolutely will not pass. You'd better think about your own behavior and curb your arrogance before allowing yourself to set the direction of the discussion. What nerve.

gwhy! · March 29, 2008, 07:32:53 AM

what a knob!

Omnibus · March 29, 2008, 07:34:22 AM

Quote from: gwhy! on March 29, 2008, 07:32:53 AM

what a knob!

Restrain your arrogance.

utilitarian · March 29, 2008, 04:39:56 PM

Quote from: Omnibus on March 29, 2008, 12:46:48 AM
Quote from: utilitarian on March 29, 2008, 12:30:33 AM
We are not getting anywhere. Good luck with your theory.

Why are you saying that (that we are not getting anywhere)? I've shown you the errors you make. How is it not getting anywhere?

Perhaps if we had an hour or so in person, we could narrow our differences further, but it would take days of forum participation to accomplish the same, and I am just not up to it.

Anyway, I think the exercise is pointless. I will never convince you, and since there is no one else who takes your side, there is no one else to convince. And you will never convince me of this theory, the physics equivalent of 2+2=5, without either (1) a self-sustaining model or (2) independent validation by those qualified in this field. And I can tell none of those are forthcoming in this lifetime.