Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Complete information on working SM style device.

Started by spherics, March 17, 2008, 12:03:53 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

aleks

Quote from: -[marco]- on March 27, 2008, 02:23:08 PM
Energy conversion is different when you consider speed. 12 volts at 100 amps is slow and the energy can not dissipate quickly enough to kill you by discharge. But, it is a lot of energy especially if converted to speed. Reduce that 100 amps to 100 mA but increase the voltage (speed) to 100,000 volts and you can electrocute someone!
"My unit operates on these principles"!!!!!.
Think about all those frequencies traveling inside the collector coil and how they interact.....
Sincerely,
?
Sorry, but you can of course kill someone with 12 volts at 100 amps. To compare correctly, you should have increased volts to 12000V at 100mA. This is also dangerous.
Your examples are not convincing, they are not physical. If you fire a cannot in a flight, the cannon will stop and the energy will not be gained twofold as you suggest (action-reaction). Also, there are no 'explosions' happen on electron level to justify your speculations. Electron carries his static electrostatic field and a bit of kinetic energy. Basically only its kinetic energy varies, which is also propagated by means of EM waves: that is the only way for electrons to transfer their energy at light speeds given their own speed is low.

turbo

Quote from: aleks on March 27, 2008, 02:32:39 PM

Your examples are not convincing


Why are you posting in the TPU area?
This was not an example.....
I bet you didn't even read it and i bet you don't even know where it comes from...

People like you will never understand.

M.

EMdevices

Hi Grumpy,Ã, 

depending on what you have or want, you can either use the square wave to work a boost coverter,Ã, 

OR

if you need nice clean sinusoidal waves, filter the squarewave and use a transformer to magnify the voltage(or just feed it into a transformer if the shape is not that important)Ã,  Make sure there is not DC component to the square wave (if there is place a decoupling cap before it)

EM

P.S.  Ok , I just saw your post right above, so you just want to boost the voltage of a square wave period.   Then use the bottom circuit.  Another possibility is obvioulsy resonance of the transformer itself, (primary winding and capacitor).  If frequency is high,  then you might want to consider a type of TESLA coil  :)

aleks

Quote from: -[marco]- on March 27, 2008, 02:40:38 PM
Quote from: aleks on March 27, 2008, 02:32:39 PM
Your examples are not convincing

Why are you posting in the TPU area?
This was not an example.....
I bet you didn't even read it and i bet you don't even know where it comes from...

People like you will never understand.
No reason to go personal. I'm here to get ideas and share ideas. Beside that 'frequencies in coils' have nothing to do with voltages and amperages. I personally cannot justify the need of differentiation between Volts and Amps beside obvious schematic building tasks, where they solve the problem of energy in - energy out coordination. Instead of writing R=V/I you could write R=Eout/Ein.

Grumpy

No, I need to maintain the square shape - undistorted preferably - and without some huge delay.

So, a 20v square goes in and a 300v square (or higher - 500v would be nice) comes out.

I found this (I believe it could be adapted for this purpose):

Like I said, I'm looking for something we can post here that everyone can use - so has to be simple and everything readily available.
It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards