Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Complete information on working SM style device.

Started by spherics, March 17, 2008, 12:03:53 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

eldarion

Quote from: aleks on March 30, 2008, 05:54:34 PM
Quote from: eldarion on March 30, 2008, 05:49:22 PMOK, I was pulling my data from here: http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Fe/nucl.html
This page shows 100MHz, Wikipedia shows 900MHz for 1H (proton). Who's right? :)

Wikipedia is for a 21 Tesla field; that page was for a 1 Tesla field.
"The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheaply, we esteem too lightly; it is dearness only that gives everything its value."
-- Thomas Paine

kames

Quote from: aleks on March 30, 2008, 05:35:50 PM
Quote from: kames on March 30, 2008, 05:26:55 PM
In addition, when an impulse is sent to the wire, there is no such a thing as broad-band.
Well, I leave this to you as I do not understand you, sorry.

@aleks,

A long time ago in this forum, I posted a link to a web site showing a graph of the inrush current before the magnetic field is established. I am lazy to search for it again, sorry. It shows that the inrush current at the beginning has a parabolic form, not linear.
Before that post, I described one of my test with BEMF and a simple transformer with two identical coils. The BEMF wasn?t my point. The point was that when an impulse is sent to a transformer after any residual field is gone it behaves in completely different way. In that test I described how the input and output was measured, all at DC level. What it showed that the output current was exceeding the input (two identical coils!!!) by about 30% (if I remember correctly) and all, again, was measured after using rectifies and smoothing capacitors. However, it wasn?t overunity. The point was, don?t send the next impulse while there is any residual magnetic flux left (that is where an iron core might be a problem, but I am not sure). What spherics is describing is a little different. He is saying that one should send the second impulse right after the first one and at the same time as close as possible to get into the space of the expending field created by the first impulse. That is where my example with the bicycles is coming from. So, here are two conditions. One is that the pulse has to be short enough to avoid any residual flux left for the second pair of pulses, and each second pulse in each pair of pulses should be very close. What spherics is describing is that there is a strange effect discovered with the above conditions.

There is something else to notice. Spherics is saying that any magnetic core is going to kill the effect. Maybe. What about the first open tpu? Don?t we have really heavy saw blades in there?
Here is another thing. The second open tpu. A lot of people have noticed that two wires are soldered together at one end. I had a look at those pictures again and again. And I have noticed that in at least of a couple of other pictures another side of the two wires also seems to be soldered together. Isn?t it strange???


Kames.

aleks

Quote from: eldarion on March 30, 2008, 06:04:41 PM
Wikipedia is for a 21 Tesla field; that page was for a 1 Tesla field.
Probably I do not understand this NMR biz that much. It seems that resonance changes with magnetic field intensity. However, what I've read about NMR measurements is that they are made with oscillating intensity. How can they measure resonance at all? Well, if they do it, then your estimate of 6.475KHz for iron in Earth's magnetic field is a correct one. Though, I do not understand how can they measure some resonance if the field is static. Probably they are using an additional weak oscillator, and the static field is considered to be "ambient conditions" (like bias signal).

aleks

Quote from: Localjoe on March 30, 2008, 05:46:54 PM
HOLY CRAP


ALEKS im glad you repeated his post i didnt read it but look at mine above and my freq table.... i think hes right on track and that confirms it.. wow freakin wow... PHI

@Eldarion

AWSOME FIND BRO PLEASE READ MY ABOVE POST

By the way, take a look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icosahedron @ picture called "Golden rectangles in an icosahedron". Makes you think considering liquid iron exhibits icosahedron symmetry.

Localjoe

@aleks and Eldarion

Ã,  
Frequency relative to 1H = 100 (MHz) 3.237778

2 X1.618 = 3.236Ã,  Iron's NMR - Earth has a spinning molten iron core as far as i know

4 X 1.618 = 6.472Ã,  Darn close to 6.475KHz which is proposed for the earths magnetic feild/ the cores magnetic feild

This device has been related many times to our planet and how it converts energy i just wanted to make those facts known again if folks had forgot

As well another good catch its a platonic solid... the ratios of pythagoras .. Plato directly relate to PHI hmm shite is comming together
GET THIS ONE - Bush wants to stop Iran from enriching uranium .. now as oberman said and others any drunk coke head can find out how to do this not just bush.

Also in reality Google has provided this info for some time.. so heres my point.

It's OK for GOOGLE TO PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONS FOR URANIUM ENRICHMENT but not OK FOR FOLKS TO SHARE TORRENTS OF MUSIC THEY POTENTIALLY OWN> AS WELL THEIR GOODS SHOULD BE SEIZED AND CHECKED AT AIRPORTS For copyright infringement.. ?????

This is the world we live in. More concerned if some exec doesn't get his buck than if some terrorist blows us to hell..