A truly overunity Transformer / Meg

[TechStuf]

Has anyone here studied the Aharanov-Bohm effect at depth?  

Consider, for example:

http://www.physics.harvard.edu/~dtlarson/tutorial05/lecture6.pdf

Especially pages 42-43.

Phase shifted electron streams interfere with one another.....It seems that, coupled with Bearden's observations, the real juice is to be found in producing sharp edge curl eddies interacting on multiple boundary layers to create a momentary cascade.  At this level, the problems become clear.  Like rectifying a lightning bolt in miniature.  

If Howard Johnson's results, did in fact rely upon producing sustained magnetic pulses of high order, then perhaps what some of us are experiencing is simply the poor man's way of simulating the effects already waiting to be produced in nanomaterials of the correct construction.  It's my guess that this has already been done.  Manufactured materials that produce energy via their interaction with the Aether.  Nanomaterials of the correct construction eliminate many concerns by their highly accurate and lasting nature.

In the mean time, there are numerous ways in which to benefit one's research by experimentation with the nature of the magnetic dipole itself.  

For instance, the much hyped collegiate notion of virtual photon flux quanta streaming solely from N pole to S pole is thoroughly discredited via a number of simple experiments.  Virtual photon streams eminate from both pole and 'knit' or spiral together from both directions creating a closed,symmetrical flux field.

Until such materials, as proposed above, are made available, certainly.....certainly there are ways of inducing sharp edge curl pulses resulting from very low friction rotary magnetic interactions into properly shaped and positioned field coils?

I mean, what we are essentially talking about here, are field compression and expansion dynamics at work.  Consider the amazing parallels between fluid dynamics research and magnetics research....Consider what is occuring in the hydrosonic pump....

I believe it to be not only likely, but perhaps a foregone conclusion that materials science, borne from dynamic systems research, has already greatly surpassed our comparatively meager efforts.  I've also little doubt that such power may be exercised on a grand scale within the next few short years.


How we react to such, will determine much.


The way I've always looked at it is, "Don't be seduced by the results of your own efforts, much less those of someone else."


Stay Real in an increasingly deceptive world,



TS

[Getca]

Hi Steven...The magnetic loops of the actual device are like this in the attached diagram. Yes, he uses a normal transformer steel and a half wave AC from a power diode to drive the control coil. The output resonant circuit is parallel, as I know and C>1000uF/380v AC. There is an usefull PM energy and it helps to reduce DTC. The control and output circuits must work in phase,  otherwise COP deeply decreases. So it isn't easy to build and get a device with optimal COP. But it is possible when the man is patient... and knows what he does. The main principle is to change the magnetic resistance of the switch core and get a PM flux modulation. It is quite different compared to T.Bearden's MEG. This isn't a transformer, because when we remove magnets the output voltage is zero. It's interesting that I get a device working on the same principle at 25kHz using ferrite cores. So the principle works fine and anyone can replicate the MEG.

Wish You soccess...
Rossen

[Nali2001]

Hello Getca and thanks for the info.
Now don't get this the wrong way but, the last picture in you previous post, is that what he told you he is using, or are you assuming this is what he is using. Especially the switching core parts. It seems like these they are made from E shaped cores. But on his site he is using O shaped or alike, so is there any specific reason for the 3 'pathways' on the switching sections?
And what is DTC?
Your sure he is using half wave ac these days? I mean his scope in the video seems to indicate pulsed dc with a cap on it for resonance.
It indeed seems a very do able project. Instead of ferrite one could easily make something out of a few microwave oven transformers.

Thanks for the info!
Steven

Oh and Gyula. Thanks for that info as well!

[Getca]

Hi Steven...It doesn't matter what core shape is used for the magnetic switch, It's only important to get core saturation and extremally decreasing magnetic resistance. Mr Ivanov uses O-shaped cores, a half wave AC U~35v eff. and a resonant circuit to get a magnetic flux change via swith core. The inventor says DTC~0.3 or time of control impulse is about 4mS as a part of the sinus wave. But when a ferrite is used at high frequency these sinus control impulse isn't possible. I use rectangular shaped impulse to drive the control coil and there is a possibility to change DTC and frequency to get a resonance and increase COP.

Best wishes...
Rossen

[gyulasun]

And what is DTC?

@Steven

DTC is  Duty Cycle.

@Rossen

Have you seen CHOBANOV VALERI's patent, BG109554, on his INTEGRATING COMMUTATOR OF MAGNETIC FLUXES ?

The online search at the European Patent Office includes only the abstract, here is a link:
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?KC=A&date=20070630&NR=109554A&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=BG&FT=D

It may be well worth seeing the Figures at least but if you think it does not give further useful info, well then no need for it?

Don't you know if  Valeri and Ivanov have been working together on the so called 'Bulgarian MEG' ?

Thanks,  Gyula