IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.

[AnandAadhar]

Sadly I was hoping to see the oneway bearings at work in version 4.0 to remove the backlash

First I was sad too, but now I understand with this exclusion that feeding the force of magnetism back onto itself always leads to a stall for an easily replicable selfrunner. What is won is that this result nicely narrows the avenue of research, so that we with more determination can work for our goal. Pure magnetic overunity is not impossible though, but it takes high speeds and refined magnetisation as with Searl's selfrunner (cross-magnetisation and over 300 rpm needed). Searl's machine maybe called a 'graviton converting centrifuge'. That is okay for industry and commerce. But it disqualifies for an easy replication needed for demonstrations in an educational setting and thus will not serve our purpose. The proof delivered by the IPMM negative outcome excludes the way of Brady, Johnson and other oneway purely magnetic concepts like the OCMPMM. Feeding the same force upon itself will the easy way never reliably deliver overunity energy. In a normal setup that you and I can follow in engineering and reasoning are at least two forces needed. That I have proven now. Two basic forces of nature constituting the relative of the ether. The relative easily gives the energy, not so much the absolute of one force driven to an extreme. The concept of draining an absolute ether (the primal ether of expansion) we have to drop for our purpose. What thus remains are the options of Finsrud and Hamel. They use the force of gravity (the universal ether of centripetal force) in relation to magnetism (the local ether of cyclic time) to create a chronic imbalance and thus arrive at a selfrunning status. I have now a design in mind to try a simplified version of Hamel's Gravito Magnetic Device. So there will be no IPMM-MAN upgrade anymore, but maybe a GMAN device for the proof of gravito-magnetic overunity 1.0. If I get it to work that is. I'll start another page here at overunity.com for that concept when my experimenting has lead to something appreciable.

AA

[AnandAadhar]

Instead of making my own page i'll post my ideas on a possible Hamel GMD at the Hamel Generator page.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,5011.msg114847.html#msg114847



AA
[/quote]

[Ergo]

You cannot make a motor self run by it's own. No matter how you arange the magnets the forces will eventually find equilibrium.
Speed doesn't matter in this case. When loaded down to perform work it will stop even faster, if not immediately.

I have studied the movies and drawings on the Searl object. I'm sorry to tell you that there is nothing remarkable going on there.
All movement is simply induced by the surrounding C-shaped electromagnets. It is a simple but funny looking regular electric motor.
No overunity at all. And no other "anti gravity" forces either for that matter. They are just looking for "easy to fool" investers.

Pure magnetic overunity is not impossible though, but it takes high speeds and refined magnetisation as with Searl's selfrunner (cross-magnetisation and over 300 rpm needed). Searl's machine maybe called a 'graviton converting centrifuge'.

AA

[AnandAadhar]

You cannot make a motor self run by it's own. No matter how you arange the magnets the forces will eventually find equilibrium.
Speed doesn't matter in this case. When loaded down to perform work it will stop even faster, if not immediately.

I have studied the movies and drawings on the Searl object. I'm sorry to tell you that there is nothing remarkable going on there.
All movement is simply induced by the surrounding C-shaped electromagnets. It is a simple but funny looking regular electric motor.
No overunity at all. And no other "anti gravity" forces either for that matter. They are just looking for "easy to fool" investers.

You really should be "cogito ergo sum", and study the replication the russians Sergi Mikhailovich Godin and Vladimir Vitalievich Roschin of the Russian Academy of Science in Moskow made. http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin2/roschgod.htm  and http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin2/roschgod.htm Their machine, called the Magneto-gravitational converter (MGC), was patented by them http://www.google.com/patents?id=cIQRAAAAEBAJ&dq=6,822,361. It was a selfrunner after 300 rpm requiring a load to keep it under control and manifested more special effects like a loss of weight and luminescence. For more articles, see: http://rexresearch.com/searl3/searl.htm. Searl is for real, believe it.

AA

[AnandAadhar]

Maybe i'll reopen the IPMM case with an 5.0 version of implementing the Achilles Ligeras/Dave Squires concept. So the loop would be pulsed by the piston that is placed in response to the cakra pulsing off-center. Will it work? I'll try a design and keep you posted if it does.
see threads:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5671.new#new
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5674.0;topicseen

AA