The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[EMdevices]

I thought I should perhaps remind you of an interesting passage from SM's letters:

It is obvious that most of the people trying to duplicate my experiment are not of the intellectual caliper necessary to develop my technology or at the very least they need to invest in some laboratory grade instruments in order to develop any progress.
I assumed that anyone working on technology this sophisticated would have a superior knowledge of electronics and an understanding of PURE frequency output being a Necessity to control the reactions going on inside the collector.
Please place this on the web site and let them know that if they do not have a more then average understanding of electron flow then they should not endeavor to try and duplicate my device because they do not stand a chance. I am tired of reading their disappointments because they do not have the education or the knowledge necessary to duplicate my technology.
Sincerely,
SMÃ,   Ã,  

and also this one:

...One of the guys who wrote in to the site said something about magnetic fields rotating at incredible speeds... and I told you that he had it! That was part of the answer. You must understand the concept of this technology in order to make more of these things. if you simply copied one it would not be conducive to your ability to make one even the slightest bit smaller or larger or different.
If you could imagine a magnetic field rotating at super fast speeds across a wire, you would see that everything we have been taught to believe about electron flow becomes different.
Think about the fact that in energy conversion using transformers, the alternating voltage is always so slow, it is like molasses...

[pauldude000]

@all

I would really like to state something here. Due to the misunderstandings between aleks and myself, towards which all reading this have been witnesses, I would like to give all some understanding.

The language of physics is a language of itself. If trying to convey a NEW concept, do not use physics terms as buzzwords or catchphrases. Be willing to EXPLAIN to the best of your ability your mental concept. Misusing or misapplying a phrase only causes confusion. It would be better to create a new term for your concept, than apply a different definition to an old term.

Imagine if I only spoke english, and was speaking to those who only spoke german, we could speak all day long and they would not understand me, nor I them. The terms used in physics (of which electronics is only a small subset) make a separate language unto itself.

If you use your own definitions, then it is comparable to me using german words speaking to native speakers of that language, but making up my own definition to what they mean. If in doubt, use plain english, so to speak.

It is not an "intelligence" thing, nor is it a "science" thing, nor is it a "inflated ego" thing, nor a "status" thing, is is a mutual understanding without unnecessary misunderstanding thing.

@everyone (ESPECIALLY the physicists of the crowd cheering this on)

Don't you DARE think I have placed myself above aleks in any manner. Yes, I have more knowledge in physics, but knowledge is variable, and easily acquired by ANYONE. I NOWHERE claim to be either more intelligent OR capable than this man. His words have demonstrated amazing insight, and those that scoff him demonstrate PUBLICLY their own inability and incapability.


Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

@all

If I have seemed testy or a little snappy today, I apologize.

I know it is no excuse, if I have unnecessarily been verbally harsh to anyone for any reason, but please understand that my 2 yr old daughter has developed a viral chest infection, of which I was just informed today, and I am not particularly in a good mood at the moment. Thankfully it has not developed into pneumonia yet, but I have personally had pneumonia enough times to know just how fast that can change. 

Paul Andrulis

[sparks]

  Sorry to hear that.  I know the frustration.  Father of 3 grandfather of 2.  God bless.

[HopeForHumanity]

Photons are virtual packets of electromagnetic information. Virtual particles are a very interesting topic, as it requires the conservation laws to be temporarily obsolete, but restored afterwards. In a sense, they are like the virtual memory on a computer. When not being used for ram overflow, they are basicaly used to map with the physical memory. Thus, they virtual memory isn't being used for the application, but sort of the behind the scenes action. Gravitons, also virtual, are a similiar concept to photons, but instead used to address gravity.

- Just trying to clear some things up...

It's all correct, right? I'm not in any physics stuff right now, but this is what I understand.