The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[aleks]

pauldude000, I think it is important to note that electric and magnetic fields can be exchanged depending on the inertial frame of reference. I'm not sure what does that mean, but it surely means that electricity and magnetism form a system of relations between them. So, while electron has no magnetic field, it may be involved in electro-magnetic interactions.

Well, it's all being pretty complex, I have no desire to continue arguing session. I hope cyclic pulsing will give you what you are looking for - no need for theories that much. Just do not try to tell physicists you have overunity - protect your brain cells.

[eldarion]

Something else interesting regarding fast rotating magnetic fields:
http://www.jstor.org/pss/2415833

I especially like the last sentence on the sample page provided...

My experiment is nearly set up, but I am having issues providing it with enough power to get the rotating field working (I am using a massive powdered iron core--if this thing can work like a TPU it would probably output several kilowatts of power )

One of the reasons I find this approach intriguing is SM's comment on fast rotating fields and the 60Hz equivalent to molasses.  I have also heard that Einstein's UFT supposedly predicts anomalies in high frequency polyphase motors, and also the MAGVID uses a similar topology.

Only a rotating field will not give anything AFAIK, but add a DC bias to the collector wire once the rotating field is set up...lifting the hose and squeezing it...

Eldarion

[aleks]

Only a rotating field will not give anything AFAIK, but add a DC bias to the collector wire once the rotating field is set up...lifting the hose and squeezing it...

I guess this should be exactly fine! Rotating field or gravity is nothing if it has nothing to accelerate. DC bias should provide the necessary meat to accelerate. It's like having a sattelite without velocity: it will dump itself onto planet. If it has velocity, planet will only add energy to its speed.

[aleks]

A Photon is a LIGHT Quanta, NOT an EM Quanta.

Well, this is last time I will comment on this. Light is EM wave, there is no difference between light and EM waves, just a different application. Model is same.

[EMdevices]

yes, I second that.   the only reason that light is refered to quanta, photon etc is because it doesn't come in a continuous spectrum since it's emited by atoms and they are quantized, or rather the electron orbits are quantized, etc..    so at the physical level, light is EM radiation just like radio waves, but of a much higher frequency.

EM