The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[pauldude000]

@All

If anyone knows of a good free website site which has decent file storage capacity, good bandwidth, and allows file hosting (hot-linking or cross-linking), please let me know.

Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

@Loner

There exist a couple of different way of hooking up, using components, using feedback, etc. which are not covered here. I will make some examples later. These are to demonstrate means of hooking up coils to allow for achievement of field rotation. I have made a PowerPoint presentation, and an Adobe Acrobat pdf file, if anyone is interested, with short descriptions of everything, and I intend to upload them to my website Sunday or Monday.. (I was bored, and I hadn't messed around with open-office's "impress" version of PowerPoint yet. Couldn't experiment at the bench because of the kids.... )

I intend to do another set with variations of components to modify current flow to achieve various objectives, such as artificial phasing etc... Will post them when I complete them. Would anybody desire some circuit pics as well?

(For instance, an astable MOSFET multivibrator circuit? Bet you didn't realize that you could use Mosfets directly AS your oscillator circuit now did you? Or push pull...... ) Them high speed fets can be used for more than just power switches. With such nice rise and fall and latency times, it is a sheer waste. (hint, instead of positive or negative sgd, think npn or pnp..... it truly does work. )

Paul Andrulis

[buzz-ard]

@ Paul - Good to see you're still at it. Good illustrations in the zips as well - I tried most of these combinations with my Tesla semi-replica. Lately I've been working with my 3-CC setup and have reached that point where I must employ some level of circuitry, like MOSFETs. Everything I've done up until now has pretty much been observation of AC-induced characteristics, and now it's DC time. But first I'm taking a few days to investigate the possibilities of the "mystery center toroid" that's being discussed in the Jack Durban Video thread, then I'll be back at it.

@ Loner - Just found your thread, posting as you test. This is most excellent! Kudos, sir. Oh - thanks for putting that whole silly reed-switch-as-commutator thing to rest. I'm glad someone finally did it.

@ Paul & TPU Group at large - It just so happens that one of my hats is ISP. I've got lots of servers and lots of storage capacity, and best of all I'm God on my network. I've been slowly building an area on one of my own Websites to hold the very type of thing Loner is posting in his thread, not to keep it separate from OverUnity.com but instead to allow me to post more photos and such without guilt of clogging up the Forum. I respect what Stefan is doing here and don't want to over-do it with my lame experiments, but I want to share them just the same.

So, Paul, I think I know a place that may be friendly to your request. We could do it a couple of ways, but I'd probably lean toward an anonymous FTP area with upload-only rights, allowing us to easily link to our pages/photos/files from these posts. Bandwidth and storage shouldn't be a problem until you create the fully-functional PaulDude000 TPU and become a celebrity, then you won't need me any more...

[buzz-ard]

Sorry I have no supporting documentation just yet, but some is coming.

Using collector feedback into the CCs definitely makes a noticeable difference in my units, usually about 30-40% of output. In my 3-CC setup, the 2nd coil (121-240 degrees) is the most influential - monkeying with frequency and feedback on this coil noticeably changes the output bias. Best results I've had is feeding back into all three from one end of the collector, and placing the load on the other end. While not over-unity, I have been able to step up voltage considerably (20 Vpp from 4 VAC square input), rectify it into DC, and drive more LEDs than current drawn from the function generators would drive. Photos soon.

[pauldude000]

@All

I just thought of something, which could get everyone on the "same  page" as to results, etc.....

One of the biggest problems to replicating a device, is that you have to build it pretty much exactly the same manner that it was built..... Not easy with hand wound coils! Considering that changes in coil diameter OR length OR winding spacing changes inductance, which changes resonant frequencies..... You then take in the sheer length of wires involved to resonate at any given low frequency, and you are talking ALOT of turns to exactly duplicate. OUCH....

The collector coils are not the problem here, it is the control coils which are a pain. Yet, for tiny experimental coils, there is a possible solution. Namely not having to wind the CC,s.....?

Hnhhhh??? (you ask wisely )

Amazingly enough, you can buy pre-wound CC's, which all have a computer controlled length of wire on a nice, easily mounted plastic spool. They are called by a different name, generally "magnet wire", and are generally relatively cheap.

Buying four of these gives you four factory wound even layered/spaced single wire CC's, WHICH SOMEONE ELSE CAN BUY TO REPLICATE YOUR RESULTS! This is also true of zip cord (speaker or lamp wire, etc...).....


Though not usefull for every type of winding scheme, it has its merits. Just a thought.


Paul Andrulis