The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[Jon]

@buzz-ard


Can I ask how you are driving your control coils? I have a similar setup and am collecting output to use as feedback but the mosfets I am using to drive the control coils causes a severe voltage drop. I have 5v from my oscillators but the mosfet drops it to 1v. My mosfets are bs170.

Any thoughts are appreciated.

Here is some more information on my setup.
http://freeenergygroup.com/

Thank you.

[Jon]

Correction.

The mosfets are actually passing 3 volts but are only dropping about one volt on the low end of the step. I can add a resistor from the gate to ground and drop the wave lower to 0v but I am still stuck with a 1 volt square wave. I suspect that I don't have enough voltage on the gate or there is too much capacitance and I need to use a mosfet driver.

[pauldude000]

@all

Here is a tpu experiment, using 1 ONE O-N-E control coil that I imagined, then had to build. Novel as all heck.

Here is a pic:



I call this my "Wagon Wheel" TPU. It has a bifiliar wound 30ga collector of four turns, inside a small solid aluminum ring. Both ring and collector are taped together.

The control coil, also 30ga is spiral wound clockwise around the entire circumference of the TPU collectors. (Plural as the ring itself is a passive amperage amplifier for the bifiliar in theory)

For size comparison of this tiny beauty, the TPU is setting in the pic upon an ordinary roll of black tape.

The beauty of this design is that the field has no choice but to rotate, irregardless of the input signal, so long as it is DC in nature.

I have had some very interesting results which I documented for you all, 8 scope shots in all:

First scope settings and pulsing system:

All but the closeup -> 2microseconds time/div at .2v/div
Closeup -> 1microsecond time/div at .1v/div

Osscilator circuits used: The real beauty of a tiny tpu is that I can drive it diectly from my two function generators.

B&K on one isolated wind from the bifiliar collector. Piece of junk on the control coil. (Sorry, did I say that? )




The pic above is of one wind of the bifiliar collector coil only pulsed with square waves at 2400 Khz (2.4 Mhz).




The pic above is with the outside control coil only pulsed at 2110Khz (2.1 Mhz).




BOTH the collector, and the control pulsed together at approx 9.8v(control) and 12v (collector)
This one demonstrates full harmonics. I do not know how it comes through in the pic, but there are sines superimposed upon the square wave, with the strongest signal being PURE SINE AC. This has me stumped!




Here is a closeup of the wave from the last shot showing full harmonics.




Why different voltages between signals?
I learned something......
This pic above is the output at the SAME voltage. ~9.5v




I learned something else.
The duty cycle, or DC offset, Makes a HUGE difference in output characteristics.
The pic above is taken with the DC offset of the control at min (minimum duty cycle, or short pulse.)




However, without the second signal into the collector bifiliar, with the control dc offset the same in the control, this is the result! This is interesting as it appears a 50% duty cycle approx, yet is SHORT DUTY CYCLE square wave input!??




This pic shows what happens at 9.8v and 12v but at one frequency -> 2110Khz. Notice some resonance reaction, but nothing like the resonance of the coil to slightly differing frequencies.

What have I learned from this, and another tiny four coil unit made with an identical ring and single collector coil, and the other coils I have made tested and ditched?

1. Resonance is not enough by itself.
2. Rotation is not enough by itself.
3. The output characteristics from every coil tried so far increase dramatically with higher voltage. 9v by itself is not enough. It must be raised to a higher potential.
4. >>>>>>Rotation is an absolute necessity<<<<<<, not merely a possible.
5. Pulsing of the collector in an isolated leg of a bifilar should be tried by all!
6. Using a Steel core is worthless. If anyone has had luck with steel or ferrite cores, give me the info. They detract from performance as far as I can see.
7. Frequency of operation for any given coil is IMPERATIVE. All of the coils tested have "sweet spot" frequencies. They may not even produce much of any output too far from a "sweet spot" (natural resonant frequency of the unit).
8. Pulse length is important.

9. This small coil scares the poop out of me, and the tiny four coil is worse.

If they were full sized, pulsed with say 50v..... OUCH! (Who am I kidding, if I were to pulse them with 50v NOW I have no clue what the field would do, or how strong it might get. It tries to explode at 12v, and feedback kicks in my B&K's safety circuitry if I turn to 15v for more than a second or two.)

I hope this gives some here some interesting insights.

Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

@all

One thing I forgot to post:

The scope was connected the entire time to the second non-pulsed section of Bifiliar winding of the collector coil.

Also, using the second channel, and setting the scope on XY, I saw the pattern of a small figure 8 at full resonance. I know what the XY lines mean, and the circle indicates rotation, but what the heck is a figure 8?

By the way, the concept for pulsing the collector segment was actually derived from Steves words. He stated something to the effect of a "magnetic wave rotating in two dimensions at once", which gave me the idea to pulse physically 90degrees or horizontally to a vertical coil. The bifiliar coil collector design is going to be incorporated into all of my new designs for just this purpose. Possibly multiple bifiliar, as I saw Art (Loner) doing in his thread.

Paul Andrulis

[otto]

Hello all,

@Paul

can you get somehow a deflection coil from a TV?

If yes, then use the coils with a core from this system. There are 2 of them. This are the outer coils. Connect them to your TPU and see the signals.

Otto