The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[aleks]

I have to go wash your ideas out of my mind before they contaminate my own.

"complexed numbered medium"?  "transient mass"? 

Kinetic energy and collisions?  Are we smashing particles now?

RE has nothing to do with "particles".

Oh, yeah. Here's another source of contamination: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiant_energy Or is it exactly what you are thinking RE is?

Now, read this and understand that who wants to contaminate your mind is not me: http://educate-yourself.org/fe/radiantenergystory.shtml
"Tesla was now operating under entirely new rules which he referred to as ?dynamic? electro-static forces" My DC Acoustic Wave is exactly dynamic electro-static force. When you change its sign, it's a gravity (mass) force. Otherwise it's an "electro-static" force you can change at your will.

[Grumpy]

Oh, yeah. Here's another source of contamination: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiant_energy Or is it exactly what you are thinking RE is?

Now, read this and understand that who wants to contaminate your mind is not me: http://educate-yourself.org/fe/radiantenergystory.shtml
"Tesla was now operating under entirely new rules which he referred to as ?dynamic? electro-static forces" My DC Acoustic Wave is exactly dynamic electro-static force. When you change its sign, it's a gravity (mass) force. Otherwise it's an "electro-static" force you can change at your will.

Yeah. OK.  I'll just leave you alone from now on.

[pauldude000]

@Aleks

What supposedly is a "DC acoustic wave"?

DC and "acoustic wave" have nothing in common. I am starting to see a piltdown man here.

Do you know about the piltdown man?

A researcher wanted to find the "missing link" of evolution so badly, and wanted others to believe in evolution to the extreme that he took human remains and ape remains, and MADE his "missing link". He was famous for a time, now is infamous.

I bring this up, as the concepts being proposed are not just conflicting, there seems to be intent behind them. I try to be generous in that it may be a misunderstanding on my part. Therefore please explain this notion.

Paul Andrulis

[aleks]

No problem, just leave it alone as Grumpy did it. Unfortunately, discussions here are largely non-constructive. Even if I had a working device, it would not help if you knew nothing about how it operated. Nobody wants to be an ape but then everybody proves by his deeds he's an ape simply by doing something without ANY understanding of what he's doing.OK, let's leave this alone.

[aleks]

Sorry, but I have to add this link: http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Tesla's_Dynamic_Theory_of_Gravity

And the quote: "There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment." E=MC^2 is unfortunately an experimental fact (together with time lag of satellites in regard to on-Earth clocks). Its understanding (and application) is, however, CAN be seen from another point of view - e.g. the one I've offered. (and you'll still have to stick to Joules if you want to transform understanding into known and proven physics). Mass is not a matter - and that's all I wanted to note. Mass is a gravitational field much like electrostatic field is. Mass is produced from stress of ordinary electrostatic fields. That's the reason Keely's "spheres in spheres" has so much meaning. When you are stressing three spheres to each other, they create additional sphere that surrounds them.

Complex-numbered medium (gas or crystal) is the medium where each node has SIX degrees of freedom meaning that position (or disposition) of each node is defined by 3 complex numbers that correspond to space's dimensionality.