The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[pauldude000]

What was funny is attributing things Einstein didn't invent or even thought about. He's not some Almighty creator.

I insist that E=MC^2 basically works with subatomic bond energies ONLY.

You may insist at your leasure, as I firmly believe in free speech, but it changes nothing. No, Einstein is not an almighty creator, and I disagree with him on many points. This topic however, is not worthy of argument, and it requires two participants to hold an argument.

Argument is over.

Paul Andrulis

[Grumpy]

Einstein stated himself that he did not know if E=MC^2 was true.

From the man himself:

All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?' Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. ? I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics. (Albert Einstein, 1954)

You want the answer?  It is quite simple, and even advanced civilizations can only offer the same answer.

"Light just is."

---------------------

EDIT:  Follow only Einstein and you are a fool, but you can make a good paycheck...

---------------------

Ever wonder what Tesla's RE is?  A changing field (use region if you like) of pressure different from the surrounding pressure.  That simple.  Like a moving air current - the wind.  Over two years I searched for that answer.  Dollard calls it dielectric flux - which it is - but does not get to the basics that the density of this field is different and changing - propagating.  Quite amazing really.  Throw a little Wilbert Smith and Francis Nipher in and you see high voltage is the key to creating the pressure differential.   Now 12v ain't gonna get it.  Just a guess as it varies, but you would need probably 20 to 50 volts just to see anything.  1000v and you getting the goods, 10k and your kickin' ass.  100k and you're a hero - news at 6.

Had mankind followed Tesla, we would be populating the star systems instead of bitching about the price of gas and how wrong Einstein really was.

[aleks]

"Light just is."

Ever wonder what Tesla's RE is?  A changing field (use region if you like) of pressure different from the surrounding pressure.

I'm sure that light is simply a longitudinal wave in a complex-numbered medium.

I think Tesla's RE is the same thing as I'm hypothesizing (DC acoustic wave). What the heck is this wave you ask? It's very simple. Take two objects that have kinetic energy and make them collide. On the very moment of collision, kinetic energy of both objects will quickly and gradually vanish for a moment. What happens to the energy? Quite simple: it is converted into DC acoustic wave (or Radiant Energy field). On the next step this RE field will accelerate collided particles and will fade away as soon as particles fly away from each other. In fact it is how MASS is created - that's why E=MC^2 works very well if you use it correctly to estimate binding energies (energy used to stick particles together). I'm just expanding the concept to any colliding particles (the reality we live in is universal) - not just nuclear bonds. To sum up, in my hypothesis, E=MC^2 can be used as a measurement of transient mass created upon collision of particles having summary energy of E. This mass as Tesla's RE is a concept totally unexplored in physics. But I'm sure it hides a key to overunity, because mass obviously is non-reactive: it can't vanish just because some other object flies nearby this mass field.

Well, I'm pretty sure that even molecular compositions may have their "defect of mass". I have not found any info on that, but according to what I've written above, molecular bonds should also affect mass.

...

I think I've "nailed" it this time. "Transient mass" appearance is exactly why discharges may work in overunity devices. The same I think applies to magnetostrictive materials and resonant modes created in them - they affect bond distances and so they should create transient masses as well.

[aleks]

To add a bit more detail, in the case of molecular bonds you may see this transient mass quite obviously when you are compressing a piece (volume) of matter. Of course, in a closed system this will increase pressure, but beside that you'll in fact increase mass of matter - together with its changed dimensions. So, now you clearly see how kinetic energy quite obviously turns into mass and potential energy together. I know this example is too simple/banal, but in search for overunity it's quite an important piece of puzzle I think.

(defect of mass is a bit inverse, because it literally "steals" mass when kinetic energy is stored in subatomic bonds - something like that happens when you expand piece (volume) of matter instead of compressing it)

[Grumpy]

I have to go wash your ideas out of my mind before they contaminate my own.

"complexed numbered medium"?  "transient mass"? 

Kinetic energy and collisions?  Are we smashing particles now?

RE has nothing to do with "particles".