The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[Grumpy]

I am going to take this a step farther. Someone told me that it is necessary to use "high voltage" to produce these kicks you guys have been making. No kidding. I could have told you that. It is the way you are trying to make them that necessitates such high voltage.

You can force a thing (hit it with a sledgehammer), or finesse a thing (do it right the first time).

I demonstrated a means to show that you can create pulses with almost linear rise anf fall times, with the pulse itself in the nano seconds, and still no one caught it. Add two of these, treated in the proper manner with the proper frequencies, and what do you have when injected together into the same conductor?

Paul Andrulis

I caught it and suggested that you use that to excite a coil of high self-induction - just for kicks - pun intended.  You can over-couple the two pancakes and cause the impulse to widen and flatten - like a square wave - to much and it gets a dip in the middle.  Just move them in relation to one another to change coupling factor or change the number of windings.

Where did you read that two signals are required?  I don't recall that from Tesla's work, except for the ball lightning thing.  A coil of high self-induction already has two paths at different velocities - there are your two signals - along the wire and between the turns. 

Notice that Tesla uses a large capacitance at the top of this coil of high self-induction - curious isn't it? In Tesla's Colorado Springs Notes, and in Dollard's Intro to Tesla Transformers - we find that high self-capacitance dampens or even prevents the effect and that capacitors store the effect (so to speak). 

Pay attention, now.  If a capacitor stores the effect then can't we use a capacitor to capture, and in-effect, "see" the result of the "effect"?  Since the effect causes changes in dielectric properties (From Patrick Flanagan), two plates with air or vacuum between them and oriented perp to the field (and hence the coil producing the effect) should show a little action - might help to bias of precharge the cap too.  You could try a tuned circuit and see if the tuning changes with only the cap near the action.  Transients are produced all the time, we just ignore them - or curse them depending on the result - LOL!

[poynt99]

Hi gajos 

Is easy.
The basic concept of magnetism. One flux of current magnetic have vary in the time.
That is, at any given time in the wire or inductor it has that to have variation of the flow.
What the peoples make is vary the voltage in the time but, the flow continues the same.

regards 

could you say a little more about what you mean exactly?

doesn't the flux vary with current? with an AC current, the flux will vary in direction and time.

[poynt99]

So do not imply that I do not build things.
Bruce 

yes good advice

c'mon, you've got time it seems to make these posts- it takes only a few seconds to post a pic, that is if you've got one. cut the BS and just admit it, you don't.

[Grumpy]

@Grumpy

What amount of amperage are we talking if that same coulomb transverses that same point in one microsecond?

1amp = 1 columb / 1 second

1000 amps = 1 columb / .001 seconds

...and that is the beauty of "running with gain".  This is a little misleading is you don't mention that the "second" has been modified by compression of the tempic field, aether, or scalar field to cause an increased rate of entropy.  So, you can see that if you compress again and again you quickly get into trouble with too much gain.  (entropy stuff based on Wilbert Smtih's work)

Four ways to compress again and again come to mind:

1. series stages of compression - like Tesla (single coil)

2. circular rotation through stages of compression - like SM's TPU, Hubbard Coil, Spheric geometrical thing  (coils in a ring)

3 and 4. either with the output looped back to the input

I would think that higher orders could be assembled to get more without the dreaded loop-back.

[Grumpy]

Message to my friend:

pyac ma droba jesi tlodlic' Truscani