New proof and blueprints on how to properly sheild magnets

[Low-Q]

Our farm tractor had an opening in the front where you could insert a crank to start it.

It always struck me how the flywheel seemed to be imbalanced...it would turn very hard until it past a certain point, where it would speed up with such force that if you were not careful the crank would  also make a very violent rotation.

Would a weight placed on a rotor at the correct location be enough to take a magnet motor past the sticky point...and with torque ?

Regards...

LOL, Yes I remember those tractors  Once in a while the farmer broke an arm, or someone got that crank in the face - looking too close - when the engine kicked back when the ignition went wrong.

Well, a weight placed correctly on a rotor would for sure cancel the sticky spot by using gravity, but when that weight are going the next half round - upwards -, it must fight agains gravity, which is then the "sticky" spot. Force, thrust, mass, gravity, or static magnetism can't do work alone. Easy as that. SMOT, "Wankel", or whatever you call the magnet motor will never work alone.

These magnet motors or constructions are all based on force and counterforce, in several forms, which at the end cancels out into nothing. They simply don't work as long as the permanent magnet or gravity doesn't change at proper intervals. And how should that happen without applying external energy?

Br.

Vidar

[Cap-Z-ro]

Yes, the trick was to let go of the crank very quickly after giving it a good turn.


I haven't seen anyone use an unbalanced rotor in any of those other experiments you mentioned though...the concept might well be worth exploring.

It would seem that by adjusting the location of the sticky spot relative to gravitational forces would allow for the momentum gathered by the unbalanced rotor carry the rotor past the sticky spot with force with each rotation?

Regards...

[utilitarian]

Yes, the trick was to let go of the crank very quickly after giving it a good turn.


I haven't seen anyone use an unbalanced rotor in any of those other experiments you mentioned though...the concept might well be worth exploring.

It would seem that by adjusting the location of the sticky spot relative to gravitational forces would allow for the momentum gathered by the unbalanced rotor carry the rotor past the sticky spot with force with each rotation?

Regards...

What you call the sticky spot is not really sticky, like glue or other frictional agent might be sticky.  The stickiness is nature telling you, "energy out equals energy in minus losses to friction, she canna give no more cap'n."  So it is impossible to move the sticky spot, because wherever you put it, that's where it will be.

[Cap-Z-ro]

The shifting of the 'sticky spot'(something I thought to be common knowledge here) by itseld is redundant.

Adding elements such as gravitational forces and the momentum gathered by the unbalanced rotor however require more consideration.

Not to dwell on a negative, but I've have learned 2 things after making many mistakes...never say never...and nothing is impossible.

Regards...

[Low-Q]

The shifting of the 'sticky spot'(something I thought to be common knowledge here) by itseld is redundant.

Adding elements such as gravitational forces and the momentum gathered by the unbalanced rotor however require more consideration.

Not to dwell on a negative, but I've have learned 2 things after making many mistakes...never say never...and nothing is impossible.

Regards...

You're probably right, but 1 - 1 is still nothing. However, I made a mistake when saying that 1 + 1 is 2. In my situation 1 + 1 is 4 - me (1), my wife (1), and two kids

br.

Vidar